Abstract
Every year, 80,000 tons of kaçak (contraband) tea, primarily of Sri Lankan and Iranian origin, makes its way to the markets of Turkey–itself the fifth-largest producer of tea in the world. While most kaçak commodities in Turkey face derision because they are understood as low-quality approximations of their formal counterparts, of dubious origins and lacking any guarantees of quality, many consumers of kaçak tea valorize it as an emblem of superior taste. Rather than being a target of derision, kaçak tea takes shape in its consumers ‘thin-waisted’ glasses as a sign of distinction. In this inverted hierarchy of values, the domestic produce is the commodity that is mocked for its weak flavor and inflated price, while the informal contraband commodity is prized. By tracing the cultural biography of kaçak tea, this essay advances a historically and geographically networked understanding of commoditization across the formal/informal divide. Studying ‘guaranteed contraband’ tea across Turkey and Iran proves productive for understanding how people negotiate and build dynamic hierarchies of taste, while transforming the confines of the formal national economy into new thresholds of conversion that draw upon formalization of informality as well as informalization of formality in market formation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 178-196 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journal of Cultural Economy |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2024 |
Funding
Research grants from Die Zeit Stiftung Bucerius Fellowship in Migration Studies, Harvard University\u2019s Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, and Harvard\u2019s Anthropology Department, Northwestern\u2019s Keyman Modern Turkish Studies Program and the Wenner-Gren Foundation funded my research. The Wenner-Gren Foundation\u2019s international workshop grant afforded me further research and writing time in Turkey. All translations from Turkish, Azeri, and Persian are mine. All transliterations follow a simplified version of IJMES guidelines. For their generous comments on this essay in its various iterations, I am grateful to Ayfer Bartu Candan, Adia Benton, Naor Ben-Yehoyada, F\u0131rat Boz\u00E7al\u0131, Ergin Bulut, Ba\u015Fak Can, Sec\u0327il Da\u011Fta\u015F, Haydar Dar\u0131c\u0131, Darcie DeAngelo, Alireza Doostdar, Julia Elyachar, Sinan Erens\u00FC, Sarah Fredricks, Daniella Gandolfo, Ghenwa Hayek, Angie Heo, Ipek Koca\u00F6mer Yosmao\u011Flu, Darryl Li, Elham Mireshghi, Zeynep O\u011Fuz, Kerem \u00D6ktem, Cihan Tekay, Nazan U\u0308stu\u0308nda\u011F. I also thank audience members at Northwestern University and Max Planck Institut f\u00FCr ethnologische Forschung, as well as workshop participants at Mekanda Adalet Derne\u011Fi for their engagement. The generous comments of the anonymous Journal of Cultural Economy reviewers greatly strengthened my analysis. Philip Roscoe and Liz McFall generously guided the review process.
Keywords
- Commodity
- Iran
- Turkey
- contraband
- fugitivity
- tea
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies