Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension

Nancy J. Butcher*, Andrea Monsour, Emma J. Mew, An Wen Chan, David Moher, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Caroline B. Terwee, Alyssandra Chee-A-Tow, Ami Baba, Frank Gavin, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Lauren E. Kelly, Leena Saeed, Lehana Thabane, Lisa Askie, Maureen Smith, Mufiza Farid-Kapadia, Paula R. Williamson, Peter Szatmari, Peter TugwellRobert M. Golub, Suneeta Monga, Sunita Vohra, Susan Marlin, Wendy J. Ungar, Martin Offringa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

98 Scopus citations


Importance: Clinicians, patients, and policy makers rely on published results from clinical trials to help make evidence-informed decisions. To critically evaluate and use trial results, readers require complete and transparent information regarding what was planned, done, and found. Specific and harmonized guidance as to what outcome-specific information should be reported in publications of clinical trials is needed to reduce deficient reporting practices that obscure issues with outcome selection, assessment, and analysis. Objective: To develop harmonized, evidence- and consensus-based standards for reporting outcomes in clinical trial reports through integration with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement. Evidence Review: Using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) methodological framework, the CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement was developed by (1) generation and evaluation of candidate outcome reporting items via consultation with experts and a scoping review of existing guidance for reporting trial outcomes (published within the 10 years prior to March 19, 2018) identified through expert solicitation, electronic database searches of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology Register, gray literature searches, and reference list searches; (2) a 3-round international Delphi voting process (November 2018-February 2019) completed by 124 panelists from 22 countries to rate and identify additional items; and (3) an in-person consensus meeting (April 9-10, 2019) attended by 25 panelists to identify essential items for the reporting of outcomes in clinical trial reports. Findings: The scoping review and consultation with experts identified 128 recommendations relevant to reporting outcomes in trial reports, the majority (83%) of which were not included in the CONSORT 2010 statement. All recommendations were consolidated into 64 items for Delphi voting; after the Delphi survey process, 30 items met criteria for further evaluation at the consensus meeting and possible inclusion in the CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 extension. The discussions during and after the consensus meeting yielded 17 items that elaborate on the CONSORT 2010 statement checklist items and are related to completely defining and justifying the trial outcomes, including how and when they were assessed (CONSORT 2010 statement checklist item 6a), defining and justifying the target difference between treatment groups during sample size calculations (CONSORT 2010 statement checklist item 7a), describing the statistical methods used to compare groups for the primary and secondary outcomes (CONSORT 2010 statement checklist item 12a), and describing the prespecified analyses and any outcome analyses not prespecified (CONSORT 2010 statement checklist item 18). Conclusions and Relevance: This CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement provides 17 outcome-specific items that should be addressed in all published clinical trial reports and may help increase trial utility, replicability, and transparency and may minimize the risk of selective nonreporting of trial results..

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2252-2264
Number of pages13
Issue number22
StatePublished - Dec 13 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this