Harnessing Implementation Science in Clinical Psychology: Past, Present, and Future

Rinad S. Beidas, Meredith Boyd, Elizabeth Casline, Kelli Scott, Zabin Patel-Syed, Chynna Mills, Brian Mustanski, Simone Schriger, Faith Summersett Williams, Claire Waller, Sarah A. Helseth, Sara J. Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Implementation science aspires to equitably accelerate the uptake of clinical research into practice to improve population health. The focus of implementation science includes individual behavior change mechanisms that are similar to those that drive the field of clinical psychology. For this reason, clinical psychologists are well-suited to take up implementation science methods in pursuit of improving the quality of behavioral health care. To do so, clinical psychologists must expand beyond individual behavior change to include a focus on organizations and systems. In this review, we reflect on ways that clinical psychologists can lead in the integration of implementation science principles and approaches into clinical psychology research and practice. We discuss the role clinical psychologists play in closing know–do gaps in behavioral health and describe how clinical psychologists can build implementation science competencies. We end with current controversies and opportunities for innovation to further improve the quality of behavioral health care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-555
Number of pages27
JournalAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online dateJan 19 2025
DOIs
StatePublished - May 7 2025

Keywords

  • behavior change mechanisms
  • implementation science
  • improving quality of behavioral health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harnessing Implementation Science in Clinical Psychology: Past, Present, and Future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this