Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation – Individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics

Margaret P. Collins, Chuan-Fen Liu, Leslie Taylor, Pamela E. Souza, Bevan Yueh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We designed this noninferiority randomized trial to determine (1) if group hearing aid fitting visits and group hearing aid follow-up visits were at least as effective as individual visits in terms of hearing-related function (measured with the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation [EAR] scale) and adherence, and (2) if group visits were less costly over the 6 mo postfitting period. For 644 participants randomized to receive their hearing aid visits in an individual or group format at the Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 6 mo outcomes showed no significant differences in Inner EAR scores between individual and group fitting (p = 0.53) or follow-up (p = 0.11), or in the number of hours per day hearing aids were worn between individual and group fitting (p = 0.90) or follow-up (p = 0.24). We found significantly higher cost for individual compared with group fitting (p <0.001) and follow-up (p <0.001). We conclude that outcomes for group hearing aid fitting and hearing aid follow-up visits were not inferior to individual hearing aid fitting and follow-up visits, with group fitting and follow-up visits yielding cost savings
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-593
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research & Development
Volume50
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation – Individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this