TY - JOUR
T1 - Helping patients decide about back surgery
T2 - A randomized trial of an interactive video program
AU - Phelan, Elizabeth A.
AU - Deyo, Richard A.
AU - Cherkin, Daniel C.
AU - Weinstein, James Neil
AU - Ciol, Marcia A.
AU - Kreuter, William
AU - Howe, John F.
PY - 2001/1/15
Y1 - 2001/1/15
N2 - Study Design. A randomized trial of 100 patients with low back pain who were potential surgical candidates. Objectives. To determine whether an interactive videodisc with a booklet is superior to a booklet alone for informing patients about back surgery. Summary of Background Data. Substantial geographic variation has been observed in lumbar spine surgery. Informed patient preferences should play an important role in decisions about surgery. However, little is known about optimal strategies for informing patients. Methods. Subjects were randomized to receive an interactive videodisc (with a booklet) or a booklet alone. A knowledge test administered at baseline and follow-up was used to measure improvement in knowledge about treatment options for lumbar spine problems. Patients' reactions to the videodisc and booklet and preferences for treatment were also assessed. Results. The patients' knowledge improved after exposure to either intervention. Multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline score, age, education, gender, and diagnosis showed a significant advantage for the videodisc with booklet over the booklet alone. The videodisc-booklet group showed significantly greater gains in knowledge among subjects with the worst baseline knowledge scores. A larger proportion of subjects in the videodisc-booklet group rated the materials easy to understand (93% vs. 72%, P = 0.04), containing the right amount of information (93% vs. 80%, P = 0.3), and adequate to assist in choice of treatment (75% vs. 51%, P = 0.2). Those who viewed the videodisc expressed a somewhat lower preference for surgery than those who received the booklet alone (23% vs. 42%, P = 0.4). Conclusions. Both the booklet alone and the combination of videodisc and booklet improved knowledge. The combination produced greater knowledge gains than the booklet alone for the subgroup with the least knowledge at baseline. Patients preferred the combination and had a slightly lower preference for surgery if they hadviewed the videopresentation. For some patients, the video may enhance involvement in clinical decisions.
AB - Study Design. A randomized trial of 100 patients with low back pain who were potential surgical candidates. Objectives. To determine whether an interactive videodisc with a booklet is superior to a booklet alone for informing patients about back surgery. Summary of Background Data. Substantial geographic variation has been observed in lumbar spine surgery. Informed patient preferences should play an important role in decisions about surgery. However, little is known about optimal strategies for informing patients. Methods. Subjects were randomized to receive an interactive videodisc (with a booklet) or a booklet alone. A knowledge test administered at baseline and follow-up was used to measure improvement in knowledge about treatment options for lumbar spine problems. Patients' reactions to the videodisc and booklet and preferences for treatment were also assessed. Results. The patients' knowledge improved after exposure to either intervention. Multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline score, age, education, gender, and diagnosis showed a significant advantage for the videodisc with booklet over the booklet alone. The videodisc-booklet group showed significantly greater gains in knowledge among subjects with the worst baseline knowledge scores. A larger proportion of subjects in the videodisc-booklet group rated the materials easy to understand (93% vs. 72%, P = 0.04), containing the right amount of information (93% vs. 80%, P = 0.3), and adequate to assist in choice of treatment (75% vs. 51%, P = 0.2). Those who viewed the videodisc expressed a somewhat lower preference for surgery than those who received the booklet alone (23% vs. 42%, P = 0.4). Conclusions. Both the booklet alone and the combination of videodisc and booklet improved knowledge. The combination produced greater knowledge gains than the booklet alone for the subgroup with the least knowledge at baseline. Patients preferred the combination and had a slightly lower preference for surgery if they hadviewed the videopresentation. For some patients, the video may enhance involvement in clinical decisions.
KW - Decision making
KW - Low back pain
KW - Patient education
KW - Patient participation
KW - Videodisc recording
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035863563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035863563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00016
DO - 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00016
M3 - Article
C2 - 11154542
AN - SCOPUS:0035863563
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 26
SP - 206
EP - 212
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 2
ER -