Hemodynamics as surrogate end points for survival in advanced heart failure: An analysis from FIRST

Monica R. Shah*, Sandra S. Stinnett, Steven E. McNulty, Mihai Gheorghiade, Faiez Zannad, Barry Uretsky, Kirkwood F. Adams, Robert M. Califf, Christopher M. O'Connor

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations


Background: Hemodynamics often are used as surrogate end points in phase II trials of acute heart failure (HF). We reviewed the Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST) database to identify the hemodynamic variables that best predict survival in patients with advanced HF receiving epoprostenol therapy and to determine whether hemodynamics could predict the overall effect of a drug. Methods: The trial enrolled 471 patients with class IIIb/IV HF and ejection fraction ≤25% for ≥3 months, all of whom underwent screening pulmonary artery catheter insertion. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either epoprostenol (n = 201) or placebo (n = 235); epoprostenol therapy was guided by pulmonary artery catheter measures, and standard treatment was guided by clinical findings. Multivariable modeling was used to identify and quantify the demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables most associated with 1-year survival. Results: In multivariable modeling, HF class, decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and age best predicted 1-year survival. After adjustment for age and HF class, decreased PCWP still significantly predicted survival (hazard ratio, 0.96 for every 1-mm Hg decrease; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 0.99; P = .003). Survival was significantly higher with decreases in PCWP ≥9 versus <9 mm Hg, even after adjustment for age and HF class. Survival of patients in the PCWP ≥9 group was comparable with, and that of the PCWP <9 group was significantly higher than, survival of patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.99; P = .024). Conclusions: The reduction in PCWP was the hemodynamic measure most predictive of survival in patients with advanced HF. However, patients with a ≥9-mm Hg decrease had no better survival than patients in the control group, who had limited changes in hemodynamics. Thus, improvement in hemodynamics may not predict the overall effect of a drug.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)908-914
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican heart journal
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Hemodynamics as surrogate end points for survival in advanced heart failure: An analysis from FIRST'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this