TY - JOUR
T1 - Hippocampal magnetization transfer ratio at 3T
T2 - Validation of automated postprocessing and comparison of quantification metrics
AU - Sidharthan, Shawn
AU - Hutten, Ryan
AU - Glielmi, Christopher
AU - Du, Hongyan
AU - Malone, Fiona
AU - Ragin, Ann B.
AU - Edelman, Robert R.
AU - Wu, Ying
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: To investigate the reliability of a novel magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) postprocessing technique for the hippocampus using histogram analysis, and compare results to more established volumetric measurements. This study is conducted in healthy volunteers as a precursor to future applications regarding progressive neurologic diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: Eight healthy subjects were scanned twice with interval of 1 week using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Automated pixel-wise analysis was performed for the hippocampal regions of each patient. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), coefficients of variation (COVs), and instrumental standard deviation (ISD). RESULTS: Reliable metrics were 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, peak location, and mean approach (ranges: ICC = 93-96, COV = 2.71-3.88%, ISD .78-1.01). Histogram peak height had ICC below .7, and a COV above 10%. Volumetric measurements had (ICC = .95-97, COV = 1.43-3.39%). CONCLUSION: Excellent scan-rescan reproducibility (ICC > .9, COV < 10%) was observed for specific MTR histogram metrics and the mean MTR approach. These results are comparable to the volumetric approach. Future studies can examine the possibility that MTR changes precede morphological changes as this study suggests that both MTR and volumetric measurements of the hippocampus can be used as reliable imaging tools.
AB - BACKGROUND: To investigate the reliability of a novel magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) postprocessing technique for the hippocampus using histogram analysis, and compare results to more established volumetric measurements. This study is conducted in healthy volunteers as a precursor to future applications regarding progressive neurologic diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: Eight healthy subjects were scanned twice with interval of 1 week using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Automated pixel-wise analysis was performed for the hippocampal regions of each patient. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), coefficients of variation (COVs), and instrumental standard deviation (ISD). RESULTS: Reliable metrics were 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, peak location, and mean approach (ranges: ICC = 93-96, COV = 2.71-3.88%, ISD .78-1.01). Histogram peak height had ICC below .7, and a COV above 10%. Volumetric measurements had (ICC = .95-97, COV = 1.43-3.39%). CONCLUSION: Excellent scan-rescan reproducibility (ICC > .9, COV < 10%) was observed for specific MTR histogram metrics and the mean MTR approach. These results are comparable to the volumetric approach. Future studies can examine the possibility that MTR changes precede morphological changes as this study suggests that both MTR and volumetric measurements of the hippocampus can be used as reliable imaging tools.
KW - 3T
KW - Histogram analysis
KW - Magnetization transfer imaging
KW - Magnetization transfer ratio
KW - Normal-control analysis
KW - Reproducibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879843892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879843892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00697.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00697.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 22817911
AN - SCOPUS:84879843892
SN - 1051-2284
VL - 23
SP - 484
EP - 490
JO - Journal of Neuroimaging
JF - Journal of Neuroimaging
IS - 3
ER -