Home Oxygen After Hospitalization for COVID-19: Results From the Multi-Center OXFORD Study

Michael B. Freedman*, Yoo Jin Kim, Ramandeep Kaur, Bijal V. Jain, Ayodeji O. Adegunsoye, Yu Che Chung, Julie A. Delisa, Jessica M. Gardner, Howard S. Gordon, Jared A. Greenberg, Malvika Kaul, Nader Khouzam, Stephanie L. Labedz, Babak Mokhlesi, Jacob Rintz, Israel Rubinstein, Analisa Taylor, David L. Vines, Lubna Ziauddin, Lynn B. GeraldJerry A. Krishnan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the first months of the pandemic, prior to the introduction of proven-effective treatments, 15–37% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were discharged on home oxygen. After proven-effective treatments for acute COVID-19 were established by evidence-based guide-lines, little remains known about home oxygen requirements following hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multi-center cohort study of subjects hospitalized for COVID-19 between October 2020–September 2021 at 3 academic health centers. Information was abstracted from electronic health records at the index hospitalization and for 60 d after discharge. The World Health Organization COVID-19 Clinical Progression Scale score was used to identify patients with severe COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 517 subjects (mean age 58 y, 47% female, 42% Black, 36% Hispanic, 22% with severe COVID-19), 81% were treated with systemic corticosteroids, 61% with remdesivir, and 2.5% with tocilizumab. About one quarter of subjects were discharged on home oxygen (26% [95% CI 22–29]). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02 per 5 y [95% CI 1.02–1.02]), higher body mass index (aOR 1.02 per kg/m2 [1.00–1.04]), diabetes (yes vs no, aOR 1.73 [1.46–2.02]), severe COVID-19 (vs moderate, aOR 3.19 [2.19–4.64]), and treatment with systemic corticosteroids (yes vs no, aOR 30.63 [4.51–208.17]) were associated with an increased odds of discharge on home oxygen. Comorbid hypertension (yes vs no, aOR 0.71 [0.66–0.77) was associated with a decreased odds of home oxygen. Within 60 d of hospital discharge, 50% had documentation of pulse oximetry; in this group, home oxygen was discontinued in 46%. CONCLUSIONS: About one in 41 subjects were prescribed home oxygen after hospitalization for COVID-19, even after guidelines established proven-effective treatments for acute illness. Evidence-based strategies to reduce the requirement for home oxygen in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-289
Number of pages9
JournalRespiratory care
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2024

Funding

This work was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant number T32HL144909 (Dr Freedman) and the Clinical and Translational Science Award Program grant number UL1TR002003 (University of Illinois Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science). The funders of this work had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to publish.

Keywords

  • durable medical equipment
  • hypoxemia
  • Long COVID
  • post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2
  • SARS-CoV-2l

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Home Oxygen After Hospitalization for COVID-19: Results From the Multi-Center OXFORD Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this