Honest Brokers: The Politics of Expertise in the “Who Lost China?" Debate

Gary Alan Fine*, Bin Xu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

As we evaluate the failures in our invasion of Iraq, much blame has been placed on the advice of a group of men and women labeled neoconservatives. These policy experts have been targeted with misinterpreting information and providing advice that contributed to mistaken, even disastrous, American policy. But more than just being wrong in their expectations, some critics, such as Seymour Hersh, suggest that these policy experts constituted a “cult, " and others allege that they were a group that placed the interests of the Bush administration, the Republican Party, or the state of Israel above that of the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSticky Reputations
Subtitle of host publicationThe Politics of Collective Memory in Midcentury America
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages151-182
Number of pages32
ISBN (Electronic)9781136485657
ISBN (Print)9780415894982
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Honest Brokers: The Politics of Expertise in the “Who Lost China?" Debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this