Hoping for the best or preparing for the worst? Regulatory focus and preferences for optimism and pessimism in predicting personal outcomes

Abigail Hazlett*, Daniel C Molden, Aaron M. Sackett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People are rarely completely accurate in forecasting their own futures. Instead, past research has demonstrated tendencies for both optimistic and pessimistic bias in thinking about one's own outcomes. Furthermore, both biases are thought to be potentially functional. Recently, an "intuitive functionalist" account of forecasting biases has been proposed (Sackett & Armor, 2010; see also Armor, Massey, & Sackett, 2008), which posits that individuals flexibly shift between optimistic or pessimistic outlooks based on the perceived value of each outlook. The present research examines people's chronic motivational orientations as one factor that influences perceptions of the functional value of optimistic or pessimistic outlooks. Across three studies, we demonstrate that those primarily concerned with growth and advancement (i.e., promotion) prefer optimistic forecasts and perform better when adopting an optimistic outlook, whereas those primarily concerned with safety and security (i.e., prevention) prefer pessimistic forecasts and perform better when adopting a pessimistic outlook.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-96
Number of pages23
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Research
Safety
Growth
Optimism
Pessimism
Thinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{a3cab16844c047b4aeb0f4fd2e9ac2b1,
title = "Hoping for the best or preparing for the worst? Regulatory focus and preferences for optimism and pessimism in predicting personal outcomes",
abstract = "People are rarely completely accurate in forecasting their own futures. Instead, past research has demonstrated tendencies for both optimistic and pessimistic bias in thinking about one's own outcomes. Furthermore, both biases are thought to be potentially functional. Recently, an {"}intuitive functionalist{"} account of forecasting biases has been proposed (Sackett & Armor, 2010; see also Armor, Massey, & Sackett, 2008), which posits that individuals flexibly shift between optimistic or pessimistic outlooks based on the perceived value of each outlook. The present research examines people's chronic motivational orientations as one factor that influences perceptions of the functional value of optimistic or pessimistic outlooks. Across three studies, we demonstrate that those primarily concerned with growth and advancement (i.e., promotion) prefer optimistic forecasts and perform better when adopting an optimistic outlook, whereas those primarily concerned with safety and security (i.e., prevention) prefer pessimistic forecasts and perform better when adopting a pessimistic outlook.",
author = "Abigail Hazlett and Molden, {Daniel C} and Sackett, {Aaron M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.74",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "74--96",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "1",

}

Hoping for the best or preparing for the worst? Regulatory focus and preferences for optimism and pessimism in predicting personal outcomes. / Hazlett, Abigail; Molden, Daniel C; Sackett, Aaron M.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 74-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hoping for the best or preparing for the worst? Regulatory focus and preferences for optimism and pessimism in predicting personal outcomes

AU - Hazlett, Abigail

AU - Molden, Daniel C

AU - Sackett, Aaron M.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - People are rarely completely accurate in forecasting their own futures. Instead, past research has demonstrated tendencies for both optimistic and pessimistic bias in thinking about one's own outcomes. Furthermore, both biases are thought to be potentially functional. Recently, an "intuitive functionalist" account of forecasting biases has been proposed (Sackett & Armor, 2010; see also Armor, Massey, & Sackett, 2008), which posits that individuals flexibly shift between optimistic or pessimistic outlooks based on the perceived value of each outlook. The present research examines people's chronic motivational orientations as one factor that influences perceptions of the functional value of optimistic or pessimistic outlooks. Across three studies, we demonstrate that those primarily concerned with growth and advancement (i.e., promotion) prefer optimistic forecasts and perform better when adopting an optimistic outlook, whereas those primarily concerned with safety and security (i.e., prevention) prefer pessimistic forecasts and perform better when adopting a pessimistic outlook.

AB - People are rarely completely accurate in forecasting their own futures. Instead, past research has demonstrated tendencies for both optimistic and pessimistic bias in thinking about one's own outcomes. Furthermore, both biases are thought to be potentially functional. Recently, an "intuitive functionalist" account of forecasting biases has been proposed (Sackett & Armor, 2010; see also Armor, Massey, & Sackett, 2008), which posits that individuals flexibly shift between optimistic or pessimistic outlooks based on the perceived value of each outlook. The present research examines people's chronic motivational orientations as one factor that influences perceptions of the functional value of optimistic or pessimistic outlooks. Across three studies, we demonstrate that those primarily concerned with growth and advancement (i.e., promotion) prefer optimistic forecasts and perform better when adopting an optimistic outlook, whereas those primarily concerned with safety and security (i.e., prevention) prefer pessimistic forecasts and perform better when adopting a pessimistic outlook.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751500881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751500881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.74

DO - 10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.74

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 74

EP - 96

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 1

ER -