HORIZONTAL CHOICE OF LAW IN FEDERAL COURT

ZACHARY D. CLOPTON*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Federal courts routinely apply state law. In diversity cases, federal courts apply the state law that the forum state would apply-the so-called Klaxon rule. Outside of diversity, the vitality of Klaxon is far less clear. Federal courts have departed from Klaxon when applying state law in cases arising under bankruptcy, admiralty, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and more. Scholars have called for courts to abandon Klaxon in cases arising under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) or consolidated as multidistrict litigation (MDL).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2193-2241
Number of pages49
JournalUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review
Volume169
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HORIZONTAL CHOICE OF LAW IN FEDERAL COURT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this