TY - JOUR
T1 - HORIZONTAL CHOICE OF LAW IN FEDERAL COURT
AU - CLOPTON, ZACHARY D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 University of Pennsylvania Law School. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Federal courts routinely apply state law. In diversity cases, federal courts apply the state law that the forum state would apply-the so-called Klaxon rule. Outside of diversity, the vitality of Klaxon is far less clear. Federal courts have departed from Klaxon when applying state law in cases arising under bankruptcy, admiralty, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and more. Scholars have called for courts to abandon Klaxon in cases arising under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) or consolidated as multidistrict litigation (MDL).
AB - Federal courts routinely apply state law. In diversity cases, federal courts apply the state law that the forum state would apply-the so-called Klaxon rule. Outside of diversity, the vitality of Klaxon is far less clear. Federal courts have departed from Klaxon when applying state law in cases arising under bankruptcy, admiralty, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and more. Scholars have called for courts to abandon Klaxon in cases arising under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) or consolidated as multidistrict litigation (MDL).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128698601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128698601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3806001
DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3806001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128698601
SN - 0041-9907
VL - 169
SP - 2193
EP - 2241
JO - University of Pennsylvania Law Review
JF - University of Pennsylvania Law Review
IS - 8
ER -