TY - JOUR
T1 - Hospital-level cardiovascular management practices in kerala, india
T2 - A cross-sectional study
AU - Yoo, Sang Gune K.
AU - Davies, Divin
AU - Mohanan, Padinhare P.
AU - Baldridge, Abigail S.
AU - Charles, Prakash M.
AU - Schumacher, Mark
AU - Bhalla, Sandeep
AU - Devarajan, Raji
AU - Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
AU - Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
AU - Huffman, Mark D.
N1 - Funding Information:
IQR indicates interquartile range; MBA, Master of Business Administration; and NABH, National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare Providers. *All individual-level characteristics are statistically significantly different at α<0.0001. †Government hospitals are owned and funded by the government. Private hospitals are for-profit and privately funded. Nonprofit/charity hospitals are typically missionary hospitals owned by religious organizations. ‡NABH is an Indian accreditation program and a public recognition for hospitals and healthcare organizations that have achieved a standard to promote high performance, patient safety, and healthcare quality.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Background: Hospital management practices are associated with cardiovascular process of care measures and patient outcomes. However, management practices related to acute cardiac care in India has not been studied. Methods and Results: We measured management practices through semistructured, in-person interviews with hospital administrators, physician managers, and nurse managers in Kerala, India between October and November 2017 using the adapted World Management Survey. Trained interviewers independently scored management interview responses (range: 1-5) to capture management practices ranging from performance data tracking to setting targets. We performed univariate regression analyses to assess the relationship between hospital-level factors and management practices. Using Pearson correlation coefficients and mixed-effect logistic regression models, we explored the relationship between management practices and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events defined as all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke, or major bleeding. Ninety managers from 37 hospitals participated. We found suboptimal management practices across 3 management levels (mean [SD]: 2.1 [0.5], 2.0 [0.3], and 1.9 [0.3] for hospital administrators, physician managers, and nurse managers, respectively [P=0.08]) with lowest scores related to setting organizational targets. Hospitals with existing healthcare quality accreditation, more cardiologists, and private ownership were associated with higher management scores. In our exploratory analysis, higher physician management practice scores related to operation, performance, and target management were correlated with lower 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event. Conclusions: Management practices related to acute cardiac care in participating Kerala hospitals were suboptimal but were correlated with clinical outcomes. We identified opportunities to strengthen nonclinical practices to improve patient care.
AB - Background: Hospital management practices are associated with cardiovascular process of care measures and patient outcomes. However, management practices related to acute cardiac care in India has not been studied. Methods and Results: We measured management practices through semistructured, in-person interviews with hospital administrators, physician managers, and nurse managers in Kerala, India between October and November 2017 using the adapted World Management Survey. Trained interviewers independently scored management interview responses (range: 1-5) to capture management practices ranging from performance data tracking to setting targets. We performed univariate regression analyses to assess the relationship between hospital-level factors and management practices. Using Pearson correlation coefficients and mixed-effect logistic regression models, we explored the relationship between management practices and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events defined as all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke, or major bleeding. Ninety managers from 37 hospitals participated. We found suboptimal management practices across 3 management levels (mean [SD]: 2.1 [0.5], 2.0 [0.3], and 1.9 [0.3] for hospital administrators, physician managers, and nurse managers, respectively [P=0.08]) with lowest scores related to setting organizational targets. Hospitals with existing healthcare quality accreditation, more cardiologists, and private ownership were associated with higher management scores. In our exploratory analysis, higher physician management practice scores related to operation, performance, and target management were correlated with lower 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event. Conclusions: Management practices related to acute cardiac care in participating Kerala hospitals were suboptimal but were correlated with clinical outcomes. We identified opportunities to strengthen nonclinical practices to improve patient care.
KW - acute coronary syndrome
KW - hospital administrators
KW - infarction
KW - leadership
KW - organization and administration
KW - patient care
KW - quality improvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066835047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066835047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005251
DO - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005251
M3 - Article
C2 - 31092020
AN - SCOPUS:85066835047
SN - 1941-7713
VL - 12
JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
IS - 5
M1 - e005251
ER -