How Children and Adults Represent God's Mind

Larisa Heiphetz*, Jonathan D. Lane, Adam Waytz, Liane L. Young

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For centuries, humans have contemplated the minds of gods. Research on religious cognition is spread across sub-disciplines, making it difficult to gain a complete understanding of how people reason about gods' minds. We integrate approaches from cognitive, developmental, and social psychology and neuroscience to illuminate the origins of religious cognition. First, we show that although adults explicitly discriminate supernatural minds from human minds, their implicit responses reveal far less discrimination. Next, we demonstrate that children's religious cognition often matches adults' implicit responses, revealing anthropomorphic notions of God's mind. Together, data from children and adults suggest the intuitive nature of perceiving God's mind as human-like. We then propose three complementary explanations for why anthropomorphism persists in adulthood, suggesting that anthropomorphism may be (a) an instance of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic; (b) a reflection of early testimony; and/or (c) an evolutionary byproduct.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-144
Number of pages24
JournalCognitive Science
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cognition
Byproducts
Social Adjustment
Social Psychology
Neurosciences
Research
Discrimination (Psychology)
Developmental Psychology
Heuristics

Keywords

  • Anthropomorphism
  • Religious cognition
  • Social cognition
  • Social cognitive development
  • Theory of mind

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Heiphetz, Larisa ; Lane, Jonathan D. ; Waytz, Adam ; Young, Liane L. / How Children and Adults Represent God's Mind. In: Cognitive Science. 2016 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 121-144.
@article{ad604cd773fc49c89d86eb9f95b80ebf,
title = "How Children and Adults Represent God's Mind",
abstract = "For centuries, humans have contemplated the minds of gods. Research on religious cognition is spread across sub-disciplines, making it difficult to gain a complete understanding of how people reason about gods' minds. We integrate approaches from cognitive, developmental, and social psychology and neuroscience to illuminate the origins of religious cognition. First, we show that although adults explicitly discriminate supernatural minds from human minds, their implicit responses reveal far less discrimination. Next, we demonstrate that children's religious cognition often matches adults' implicit responses, revealing anthropomorphic notions of God's mind. Together, data from children and adults suggest the intuitive nature of perceiving God's mind as human-like. We then propose three complementary explanations for why anthropomorphism persists in adulthood, suggesting that anthropomorphism may be (a) an instance of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic; (b) a reflection of early testimony; and/or (c) an evolutionary byproduct.",
keywords = "Anthropomorphism, Religious cognition, Social cognition, Social cognitive development, Theory of mind",
author = "Larisa Heiphetz and Lane, {Jonathan D.} and Adam Waytz and Young, {Liane L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cogs.12232",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "121--144",
journal = "Cognitive Science",
issn = "0364-0213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Heiphetz, L, Lane, JD, Waytz, A & Young, LL 2016, 'How Children and Adults Represent God's Mind', Cognitive Science, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12232

How Children and Adults Represent God's Mind. / Heiphetz, Larisa; Lane, Jonathan D.; Waytz, Adam; Young, Liane L.

In: Cognitive Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 121-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Children and Adults Represent God's Mind

AU - Heiphetz, Larisa

AU - Lane, Jonathan D.

AU - Waytz, Adam

AU - Young, Liane L.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - For centuries, humans have contemplated the minds of gods. Research on religious cognition is spread across sub-disciplines, making it difficult to gain a complete understanding of how people reason about gods' minds. We integrate approaches from cognitive, developmental, and social psychology and neuroscience to illuminate the origins of religious cognition. First, we show that although adults explicitly discriminate supernatural minds from human minds, their implicit responses reveal far less discrimination. Next, we demonstrate that children's religious cognition often matches adults' implicit responses, revealing anthropomorphic notions of God's mind. Together, data from children and adults suggest the intuitive nature of perceiving God's mind as human-like. We then propose three complementary explanations for why anthropomorphism persists in adulthood, suggesting that anthropomorphism may be (a) an instance of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic; (b) a reflection of early testimony; and/or (c) an evolutionary byproduct.

AB - For centuries, humans have contemplated the minds of gods. Research on religious cognition is spread across sub-disciplines, making it difficult to gain a complete understanding of how people reason about gods' minds. We integrate approaches from cognitive, developmental, and social psychology and neuroscience to illuminate the origins of religious cognition. First, we show that although adults explicitly discriminate supernatural minds from human minds, their implicit responses reveal far less discrimination. Next, we demonstrate that children's religious cognition often matches adults' implicit responses, revealing anthropomorphic notions of God's mind. Together, data from children and adults suggest the intuitive nature of perceiving God's mind as human-like. We then propose three complementary explanations for why anthropomorphism persists in adulthood, suggesting that anthropomorphism may be (a) an instance of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic; (b) a reflection of early testimony; and/or (c) an evolutionary byproduct.

KW - Anthropomorphism

KW - Religious cognition

KW - Social cognition

KW - Social cognitive development

KW - Theory of mind

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956664477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956664477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cogs.12232

DO - 10.1111/cogs.12232

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 121

EP - 144

JO - Cognitive Science

JF - Cognitive Science

SN - 0364-0213

IS - 1

ER -