How communication improves efficiency in bargaining games

Kathleen Valley*, Leigh Thompson, Robert Gibbons, Max H. Bazerman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Scopus citations

Abstract

We study a double auction with two-sided private information and preplay communication, for which Myerson and Satterthwaite (1983, J. Econ. Theory 28, 265-281) showed that all equilibria are inefficient and the Chatterjee-Samuleson linear equilibrium is most efficient. Like several others, we find that players use communication to surpass equilibrium levels of efficiency, especially when the communication is face-to-face. Our main contribution is an analysis of how communication helps the parties achieve such high levels of efficiency. We find that when preplay communication is allowed, efficiency above equilibrium levels is a result of what we call "dyadic" strategies that allow the parties to coordinate on a single price that reflects both parties' valuations. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C78, D82.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-155
Number of pages29
JournalGames and Economic Behavior
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Keywords

  • Coordination
  • Preplay communication
  • Private information games

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How communication improves efficiency in bargaining games'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this