How could religious liberty be a human right?

Andrew M M Koppelman*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    A growing number of scholars think "religious liberty" is a bad idea. The unfairness objection is that singling out religion for special protection is unjust to comparable nonreligious conceptions of the good. The distraction objection asserts that religious liberty is a misleading lens: oppression sometimes occurs along religious lines, but the underlying conflicts often are not really about religious difference. Both objections are sound, but under certain conditions religious liberty should nonetheless be regarded as a right. Law is inevitably crude. The state cannot possibly recognize each individual's unique identity-constituting attachments. It can, at best, protect broad classes of ends that many people share. "Religion" is such a class. Where it is an important marker of identity for many people, it is an appropriate category of protection.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)985-1005
    Number of pages21
    JournalInternational Journal of Constitutional Law
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 9 2018

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How could religious liberty be a human right?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this