TY - GEN
T1 - How do students talk about intelligence? An Investigation of Motivation, Self-efficacy, and Mindsets in Computer Science
AU - Gorson, Jamie
AU - O'Rourke, Eleanor Mary
PY - 2019/7/30
Y1 - 2019/7/30
N2 - Undergraduate programs in computer science (CS) face high dropout rates, and many students struggle while learning to program. Studies show that perceived programming ability is a significant factor in students’ decision to major in CS. Fortunately, psychology research shows that promoting the growth mindset, or the belief that intelligence grows with effort, can improve student persistence and performance. However, mindset interventions have been less successful in CS than in other domains. We conducted a small-scale interview study to explore how CS students talk about their intelligence, mindsets, and programming behaviors. We found that students’ mindsets rarely aligned with definitions in the literature; some present mindsets that combine fixed and growth attributes, while others behave in ways that do not align with their mindsets. We also found that students frequently evaluate their self-efficacy by appraising their programming intelligence, using surprising criteria like typing speed and ease of debugging to measure ability. We conducted a survey study with 103 students to explore these self-assessment criteria further, and found that students use varying and conflicting criteria to evaluate intelligence in CS. We believe the criteria that students choose may interact with mindsets and impact their motivation and approach to programming, which could help explain the limited success of mindset interventions in CS.
AB - Undergraduate programs in computer science (CS) face high dropout rates, and many students struggle while learning to program. Studies show that perceived programming ability is a significant factor in students’ decision to major in CS. Fortunately, psychology research shows that promoting the growth mindset, or the belief that intelligence grows with effort, can improve student persistence and performance. However, mindset interventions have been less successful in CS than in other domains. We conducted a small-scale interview study to explore how CS students talk about their intelligence, mindsets, and programming behaviors. We found that students’ mindsets rarely aligned with definitions in the literature; some present mindsets that combine fixed and growth attributes, while others behave in ways that do not align with their mindsets. We also found that students frequently evaluate their self-efficacy by appraising their programming intelligence, using surprising criteria like typing speed and ease of debugging to measure ability. We conducted a survey study with 103 students to explore these self-assessment criteria further, and found that students use varying and conflicting criteria to evaluate intelligence in CS. We believe the criteria that students choose may interact with mindsets and impact their motivation and approach to programming, which could help explain the limited success of mindset interventions in CS.
KW - Growth Mindset
KW - Motivation
KW - Qualitative methods
KW - Self-efficacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071301773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071301773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3291279.3339413
DO - 10.1145/3291279.3339413
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - ICER 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
SP - 21
EP - 29
BT - ICER 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 15th Annual International Computing Education Research Conference, ICER 2019
Y2 - 12 August 2019 through 14 August 2019
ER -