TY - JOUR
T1 - How economic inequality shapes mobility expectations and behaviour in disadvantaged youth
AU - Browman, Alexander S.
AU - Destin, Mesmin
AU - Kearney, Melissa S.
AU - Levine, Phillip B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Economic inequality can have a range of negative consequences for those in younger generations, particularly for those from lower-socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Economists and psychologists, among other social scientists, have addressed this issue, but have proceeded largely in parallel. This Perspective outlines how these disciplines have proposed and provided empirical support for complementary theoretical models. Specifically, both disciplines emphasize that inequality weakens people’s belief in socioeconomic opportunity, thereby reducing the likelihood that low-SES young people will engage in behaviours that would improve their chances of upward mobility (for example, persisting in school or averting teenage pregnancy). In integrating the methods and techniques of economics and psychology, we offer a cohesive framework for considering this issue. When viewed as a whole, the interdisciplinary body of evidence presents a more complete and compelling framework than does either discipline alone. We use this unification to offer policy recommendations that would advance prospects for mobility among low-SES young people.
AB - Economic inequality can have a range of negative consequences for those in younger generations, particularly for those from lower-socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Economists and psychologists, among other social scientists, have addressed this issue, but have proceeded largely in parallel. This Perspective outlines how these disciplines have proposed and provided empirical support for complementary theoretical models. Specifically, both disciplines emphasize that inequality weakens people’s belief in socioeconomic opportunity, thereby reducing the likelihood that low-SES young people will engage in behaviours that would improve their chances of upward mobility (for example, persisting in school or averting teenage pregnancy). In integrating the methods and techniques of economics and psychology, we offer a cohesive framework for considering this issue. When viewed as a whole, the interdisciplinary body of evidence presents a more complete and compelling framework than does either discipline alone. We use this unification to offer policy recommendations that would advance prospects for mobility among low-SES young people.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061499813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061499813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41562-018-0523-0
DO - 10.1038/s41562-018-0523-0
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30953016
AN - SCOPUS:85061499813
SN - 2397-3374
VL - 3
SP - 214
EP - 220
JO - Nature human behaviour
JF - Nature human behaviour
IS - 3
ER -