How group discussions create strong attitudes and strong partisans

Matthew S. Levendusky*, James N. Druckman, Audrey McLain

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Group discussions matter in politics—they affect individuals’ attitudes as well as their political participation. But how do discussions influence the strength of attitudes? This is a question that has received scant attention, despite its relevance to both empirical and normative theories of democracy. We argue that group discussion generates strong attitudes via psychological elaboration. For many, this is a positive outcome. But we also show that discussion has a downside. Specifically, homogenous group discussions—which are the norm—strengthen partisan identities, which can increase partisan bias and motivated reasoning. Using an original experiment, we find strong support for our predictions. Our results, then, underline a tension in the political effects of group discussion: while it produces normatively desirable strong attitudes, it also creates more entrenched and potentially biased partisans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalResearch and Politics
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Keywords

  • Attitude strength
  • Group discussion
  • Political psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How group discussions create strong attitudes and strong partisans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this