How many blinks are necessary for a reliable startle response? A test using the NPU-threat task

Lynne Lieberman, Elizabeth S. Stevens, Carter J. Funkhouser, Anna Weinberg, Casey Sarapas, Ashley A. Huggins, Stewart A Shankman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Emotion-modulated startle is a frequently used method in affective science. Although there is a growing literature on the reliability of this measure, it is presently unclear how many startle responses are necessary to obtain a reliable signal. The present study therefore evaluated the reliability of startle responding as a function of number of startle responses (NoS) during a widely used threat-of-shock paradigm, the NPU-threat task, in a clinical (N = 205) and non-clinical (N = 92) sample. In the clinical sample, internal consistency was also examined independently for healthy controls vs. those with panic disorder and/or major depression and retest reliability was assessed as a function of NoS. Although results varied somewhat by diagnosis and for retest reliability, the overall pattern of results suggested that six startle responses per condition were necessary to obtain acceptable reliability in clinical and non-clinical samples during this threat-of-shock paradigm in the present study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-30
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Psychophysiology
Volume114
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Keywords

  • Anxiety-potentiated startle
  • Emotion-modulated startle
  • Eyeblink startle reflex
  • Fear-potentiated startle
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • General Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How many blinks are necessary for a reliable startle response? A test using the NPU-threat task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this