How not to argue against the crime of aggression: A response to Michael Glennon

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

The International Criminal Court is considering adding 'aggression' to the crimes for which individuals can be prosecuted by the Court. Michael Glennon's recent article on the subject criticizes this effort from many angles, but a close consideration of his objections shows that each of them misses its target. I use his argument to suggest that there are five important legal and political questions that the ICC must answer to defend its project. Glennon's article helps raise these questions but does little to answer them.

The Roberta Buffett Center forInternational and Comparative Studies at Northwestern University.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherNorthwestern University
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How not to argue against the crime of aggression: A response to Michael Glennon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this