TY - JOUR
T1 - How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
AU - Henderson, Macey L.
AU - Adler, Joel T.
AU - Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E.
AU - Thomas, Alvin G.
AU - Herron, Patrick D.
AU - Waldram, Madeleine M.
AU - Ruck, Jessica M.
AU - Purnell, Tanjala S.
AU - Dibrito, Sandra R.
AU - Holscher, Courtenay M.
AU - Haugen, Christine E.
AU - Alimi, Yewande
AU - Konel, Jonathan M.
AU - Eno, Ann K.
AU - Garonzik Wang, Jacqueline M.
AU - Gordon, Elisa J.
AU - Lentine, Krista L.
AU - Schaffer, Randolph L.
AU - Cameron, Andrew M.
AU - Segev, Dorry L.
N1 - Funding Information:
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) grant numbers K01DK114388-01 (PI: Henderson), F32DK105600 (PI: DiBrito), 4R01DK096008-04 (PI: Segev), and 5K24DK101828-03 (PI: Segev), 1F32DK109662-01 (PI: Holscher), National Institute of Aging 1F32AG053025-01A1 (PI: Haugen) and by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) grant number K01HS024600 (PI: Purnell), the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Research Mentorship grant (Dorry Segev and Jessica Ruck); and National
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Background. Social media platforms are increasingly used in surgery and have shown promise as effective tools to promote deceased donation and expand living donor transplantation. There is a growing need to understand how social media-driven communication is perceived by providers in the field of transplantation. Methods. We surveyed 299 members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their use of, attitudes toward, and perceptions of social media and analyzed relationships between responses and participant characteristics. Results. Respondents used social media to communicate with: family and friends (76%), surgeons (59%), transplant professionals (57%), transplant recipients (21%), living donors (16%), and waitlisted candidates (15%). Most respondents (83%) reported using social media for at least 1 purpose. Although most (61%) supported sharing information with transplant recipients via social media, 42% believed it should not be used to facilitate living donor-recipient matching. Younger age (P = 0.02) and fewer years of experience in the field of transplantation (P = 0.03) were associated with stronger belief that social media can be influential in living organ donation. Respondents at transplant centers with higher reported use of social media had more favorable views about sharing information with transplant recipients (P < 0.01), increasing awareness about deceased organ donation (P < 0.01), and advertising for transplant centers (P < 0.01). Individual characteristics influence opinions about the role and clinical usefulness of social media. Conclusions. Transplant center involvement and support for social media may influence clinician perceptions and practices. Increasing use of social media among transplant professionals may provide an opportunity to deliver high-quality information to patients.
AB - Background. Social media platforms are increasingly used in surgery and have shown promise as effective tools to promote deceased donation and expand living donor transplantation. There is a growing need to understand how social media-driven communication is perceived by providers in the field of transplantation. Methods. We surveyed 299 members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their use of, attitudes toward, and perceptions of social media and analyzed relationships between responses and participant characteristics. Results. Respondents used social media to communicate with: family and friends (76%), surgeons (59%), transplant professionals (57%), transplant recipients (21%), living donors (16%), and waitlisted candidates (15%). Most respondents (83%) reported using social media for at least 1 purpose. Although most (61%) supported sharing information with transplant recipients via social media, 42% believed it should not be used to facilitate living donor-recipient matching. Younger age (P = 0.02) and fewer years of experience in the field of transplantation (P = 0.03) were associated with stronger belief that social media can be influential in living organ donation. Respondents at transplant centers with higher reported use of social media had more favorable views about sharing information with transplant recipients (P < 0.01), increasing awareness about deceased organ donation (P < 0.01), and advertising for transplant centers (P < 0.01). Individual characteristics influence opinions about the role and clinical usefulness of social media. Conclusions. Transplant center involvement and support for social media may influence clinician perceptions and practices. Increasing use of social media among transplant professionals may provide an opportunity to deliver high-quality information to patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062093412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062093412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002243
DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002243
M3 - Article
C2 - 29684002
AN - SCOPUS:85062093412
SN - 0041-1337
VL - 103
SP - 573
EP - 580
JO - Transplantation
JF - Transplantation
IS - 3
ER -