How Stable and Reasonable is Postcommunist Public Opinion? The Case of the Czech Republic

Andrew Roberts*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


The quality of democracy depends on both politicians and citizens. While most attention has focused on politicians, this paper looks at citizens. There has been some scepticism about whether the postcommunist public is prepared to rule their countries. The legacies of communism and the rigours of the transition may have produced citizens whose opinions are unstable and ill-informed and therefore a poor basis for democratic policy making. This paper tests this proposition by considering the nature of public opinion in the Czech Republic. Its main conclusion is that postcommunist public opinion is more reasonable than conventional wisdom suggests. Opinions on most policies change slowly if at all and when they do change the changes are prompted more by gradual shifts in mores than by political manipulation. This suggests that citizens in the region are prepared to have a significant voice in policy making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)925-944
Number of pages20
JournalEurope - Asia Studies
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jul 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'How Stable and Reasonable is Postcommunist Public Opinion? The Case of the Czech Republic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this