TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypothetical outcome plots outperform error bars and violin plots for inferences about reliability of variable ordering
AU - Hullman, Jessica Ruth
AU - Resnick, Paul
AU - Adar, Eytan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Hullman et al.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Many visual depictions of probability distributions, such as error bars, are difficult for users to accurately interpret. We present and study an alternative representation, Hypothetical Outcome Plots (HOPs), that animates a finite set of individual draws. In contrast to the statistical background required to interpret many static representations of distributions, HOPs require relatively little background knowledge to interpret. Instead, HOPs enables viewers to infer properties of the distribution using mental processes like counting and integration. We conducted an experiment comparing HOPs to error bars and violin plots. With HOPs, people made much more accurate judgments about plots of two and three quantities. Accuracy was similar with all three representations for most questions about distributions of a single quantity.
AB - Many visual depictions of probability distributions, such as error bars, are difficult for users to accurately interpret. We present and study an alternative representation, Hypothetical Outcome Plots (HOPs), that animates a finite set of individual draws. In contrast to the statistical background required to interpret many static representations of distributions, HOPs require relatively little background knowledge to interpret. Instead, HOPs enables viewers to infer properties of the distribution using mental processes like counting and integration. We conducted an experiment comparing HOPs to error bars and violin plots. With HOPs, people made much more accurate judgments about plots of two and three quantities. Accuracy was similar with all three representations for most questions about distributions of a single quantity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956865484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956865484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0142444
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0142444
M3 - Article
C2 - 26571487
AN - SCOPUS:84956865484
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 10
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 11
M1 - e0142444
ER -