TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying Common and Unique Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Evidence-Based Practices for Suicide Prevention across Primary Care and Specialty Mental Health Settings
AU - Davis, Molly
AU - Siegel, Jennifer
AU - Becker-Haimes, Emily M.
AU - Jager-Hyman, Shari
AU - Beidas, Rinad S.
AU - Young, Jami F.
AU - Wislocki, Katherine
AU - Futterer, Anne
AU - Mautone, Jennifer A.
AU - Buttenheim, Alison M.
AU - Mandell, David S.
AU - Marx, Darby
AU - Wolk, Courtney Benjamin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Academy for Suicide Research.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objective: We identified common and unique barriers and facilitators of evidence-based suicide prevention practices across primary care practices with integrated behavioral health services and specialty mental health settings to identify generalizable strategies for enhancing future implementation efforts. Method: Twenty-six clinicians and practice leaders from behavioral health (n = 2 programs) and primary care (n = 4 clinics) settings participated. Participation included a semi-structured qualitative interview on barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based suicide prevention practices. Within that interview, clinicians participated in a chart-stimulated recall exercise to gather additional information about decision making regarding suicide screening. Interview guides and qualitative coding were informed by leading frameworks in implementation science and behavioral science, and an integrated approach to interpreting qualitative results was used. Results: There were a number of similar themes associated with implementation of suicide prevention practices across settings and clinician types, such as the benefits of inter-professional collaboration and uncertainties about managing suicidality once risk was disclosed. Clinicians also highlighted barriers unique to their settings. For primary care settings, time constraints and competing demands were consistently described as barriers. For specialty mental health settings, difficulties coordinating care with schools and other providers in the community made implementation of suicide prevention practices challenging. Conclusion: Findings can inform the development and testing of implementation strategies that are generalizable across primary care and specialty mental health settings, as well as those tailored for unique site needs, to enhance use of evidence-based suicide prevention practices in settings where individuals at risk for suicide are especially likely to present.HIGHLIGHTS We examined barriers and facilitators to suicide prevention across health settings. Common and unique barriers and facilitators across health-care settings emerged. Findings can enhance suicide prevention implementation across health-care settings.
AB - Objective: We identified common and unique barriers and facilitators of evidence-based suicide prevention practices across primary care practices with integrated behavioral health services and specialty mental health settings to identify generalizable strategies for enhancing future implementation efforts. Method: Twenty-six clinicians and practice leaders from behavioral health (n = 2 programs) and primary care (n = 4 clinics) settings participated. Participation included a semi-structured qualitative interview on barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based suicide prevention practices. Within that interview, clinicians participated in a chart-stimulated recall exercise to gather additional information about decision making regarding suicide screening. Interview guides and qualitative coding were informed by leading frameworks in implementation science and behavioral science, and an integrated approach to interpreting qualitative results was used. Results: There were a number of similar themes associated with implementation of suicide prevention practices across settings and clinician types, such as the benefits of inter-professional collaboration and uncertainties about managing suicidality once risk was disclosed. Clinicians also highlighted barriers unique to their settings. For primary care settings, time constraints and competing demands were consistently described as barriers. For specialty mental health settings, difficulties coordinating care with schools and other providers in the community made implementation of suicide prevention practices challenging. Conclusion: Findings can inform the development and testing of implementation strategies that are generalizable across primary care and specialty mental health settings, as well as those tailored for unique site needs, to enhance use of evidence-based suicide prevention practices in settings where individuals at risk for suicide are especially likely to present.HIGHLIGHTS We examined barriers and facilitators to suicide prevention across health settings. Common and unique barriers and facilitators across health-care settings emerged. Findings can enhance suicide prevention implementation across health-care settings.
KW - Implementation
KW - prevention
KW - primary care
KW - specialty mental health
KW - suicide
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117169835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117169835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13811118.2021.1982094
DO - 10.1080/13811118.2021.1982094
M3 - Article
C2 - 34651544
AN - SCOPUS:85117169835
SN - 1381-1118
JO - Archives of Suicide Research
JF - Archives of Suicide Research
ER -