TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying emergency department symptom-based diagnoses with the unified medical language system
AU - Slovis, Benjamin H.
AU - McCarthy, Danielle M.
AU - Nord, Garrison
AU - Doty, Amanda M.B.
AU - Piserchia, Katherine
AU - Rising, Kristin L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by grant number R18HS025651 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Publication made possible in part by support from the Thomas Jefferson University + Philadelphia University Open Access Fund.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. This project was supported by grant number R18HS025651 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Slovis et al.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Introduction: Many patients who are discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a symptom-based discharge diagnosis (SBD) have post-discharge challenges related to lack of a definitive discharge diagnosis and follow-up plan. There is no well-defined method for identifying patients with a SBD without individual chart review. We describe a method for automated identification of SBDs from ICD-10 codes using the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus. Methods: We mapped discharge diagnosis, with use of ICD-10 codes from a one-month period of ED discharges at an urban, academic ED to UMLS concepts and semantic types. Two physician reviewers independently manually identified all discharge diagnoses consistent with SBDs. We calculated inter-rater reliability for manual review and the sensitivity and specificity for our automated process for identifying SBDs against this "gold standard."Results: We identified 3642 ED discharges with 1382 unique discharge diagnoses that corresponded to 875 unique ICD-10 codes and 10 UMLS semantic types. Over one third (37.5%, n = 1367) of ED discharges were assigned codes that mapped to the "Sign or Symptom"semantic type. Inter-rater reliability for manual review of SBDs was very good (0.87). Sensitivity and specificity of our automated process for identifying encounters with SBDs were 84.7% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Use of our automated process to identify ICD-10 codes that classify into the UMLS "Sign or Symptom"semantic type identified the majority of patients with a SBD. While this method needs refinement to increase sensitivity of capture, it has potential to automate an otherwise highly timeconsuming process. This novel use of informatics methods can facilitate future research specific to patients with SBDs.
AB - Introduction: Many patients who are discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a symptom-based discharge diagnosis (SBD) have post-discharge challenges related to lack of a definitive discharge diagnosis and follow-up plan. There is no well-defined method for identifying patients with a SBD without individual chart review. We describe a method for automated identification of SBDs from ICD-10 codes using the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus. Methods: We mapped discharge diagnosis, with use of ICD-10 codes from a one-month period of ED discharges at an urban, academic ED to UMLS concepts and semantic types. Two physician reviewers independently manually identified all discharge diagnoses consistent with SBDs. We calculated inter-rater reliability for manual review and the sensitivity and specificity for our automated process for identifying SBDs against this "gold standard."Results: We identified 3642 ED discharges with 1382 unique discharge diagnoses that corresponded to 875 unique ICD-10 codes and 10 UMLS semantic types. Over one third (37.5%, n = 1367) of ED discharges were assigned codes that mapped to the "Sign or Symptom"semantic type. Inter-rater reliability for manual review of SBDs was very good (0.87). Sensitivity and specificity of our automated process for identifying encounters with SBDs were 84.7% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Use of our automated process to identify ICD-10 codes that classify into the UMLS "Sign or Symptom"semantic type identified the majority of patients with a SBD. While this method needs refinement to increase sensitivity of capture, it has potential to automate an otherwise highly timeconsuming process. This novel use of informatics methods can facilitate future research specific to patients with SBDs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075312926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075312926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5811//WESTJEM.2019.8.44230
DO - 10.5811//WESTJEM.2019.8.44230
M3 - Article
C2 - 31738718
AN - SCOPUS:85075312926
SN - 1936-900X
VL - 20
SP - 910
EP - 917
JO - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 6
ER -