Imagining the future of LGBTQ+ evaluation: New(er) directions and what comes next

Dylan Felt*, Esrea Perez-Bill*, Eric Barela, Nicole Cundiff, Radaya Ellis, La Shaune Johnson, Nicholas Metcalf, Travis Robert Moore, Ash Philliber, Jeffrey Poirier, Sarah Daniel Rasher, Cindy Rizzo, Erik Elías Glenn, Gregory Phillips

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We close this issue of New Directions for Evaluation by looking towards the future. In this chapter, the perspectives of 10 LGBTQ+ Evaluators whose voices and insights were not otherwise featured in this issue provide their critical insights on what LGBTQ+ Evaluation means to them, what it looks like in practice, and where they hope to see it grow in the future, including how the work of this issue of New Directions for Evaluation can be expanded and built upon. In closing the issue on a critical, futures-oriented note, we reaffirm our assertion that this is neither the first, nor the final word on LGBTQ+ Evaluation, and we invite all evaluators to join in the process of articulating and exploring what LGBTQ+ Evaluation is, and can be.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-191
Number of pages21
JournalNew Directions for Evaluation
Volume2022
Issue number175
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imagining the future of LGBTQ+ evaluation: New(er) directions and what comes next'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this