TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of billing reforms on academic hospitalist physician and advanced practice provider collaboration
T2 - A qualitative study
AU - Westergaard, Sara
AU - Bowden, Kasey
AU - Astik, Gopi J.
AU - Bowling, Greg
AU - Keniston, Angela
AU - Linker, Anne
AU - Sakumoto, Matthew
AU - Schwatka, Natalie
AU - Auerbach, Andrew
AU - Burden, Marisha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Hospital Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Hospital Medicine.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Background: Medicare previously announced plans for new billing reforms for inpatient visits that are shared by physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) whereby the clinician spending the most time on the patient visit would bill for the visit. Objective: To understand how inpatient hospital medicine teams utilize APPs in patient care and how the proposed billing policies might impact future APP utilization. Design, Setting and Participants: We conducted focus groups with hospitalist physicians, APPs, and other leaders from 21 academic hospitals across the United States. Utilizing rapid qualitative methods, focus groups were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive method at the semantic level with templated summaries and matrix analysis. Thirty-three individuals (physicians [n = 21], APPs [n = 10], practice manager [n = 1], and patient representative [n = 1]) participated in six focus groups. Results: Four themes emerged from the analysis of the focus groups, including: (1) staffing models with APPs are rapidly evolving, (2) these changes were felt to be driven by staffing shortages, financial models, and governance with minimal consideration to teamwork and relationships, (3) time-based billing was perceived to value tasks over cognitive workload, and (4) that the proposed billing changes may create unintended consequences impacting collaboration and professional satisfaction. Conclusions: Physician and APP collaborative care models are increasingly evolving to independent visits often driven by workloads, financial drivers, and local regulations such as medical staff rules and hospital bylaws. Understanding which staffing models produce optimal patient, clinician, and organizational outcomes should inform billing policies rather than the reverse.
AB - Background: Medicare previously announced plans for new billing reforms for inpatient visits that are shared by physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) whereby the clinician spending the most time on the patient visit would bill for the visit. Objective: To understand how inpatient hospital medicine teams utilize APPs in patient care and how the proposed billing policies might impact future APP utilization. Design, Setting and Participants: We conducted focus groups with hospitalist physicians, APPs, and other leaders from 21 academic hospitals across the United States. Utilizing rapid qualitative methods, focus groups were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive method at the semantic level with templated summaries and matrix analysis. Thirty-three individuals (physicians [n = 21], APPs [n = 10], practice manager [n = 1], and patient representative [n = 1]) participated in six focus groups. Results: Four themes emerged from the analysis of the focus groups, including: (1) staffing models with APPs are rapidly evolving, (2) these changes were felt to be driven by staffing shortages, financial models, and governance with minimal consideration to teamwork and relationships, (3) time-based billing was perceived to value tasks over cognitive workload, and (4) that the proposed billing changes may create unintended consequences impacting collaboration and professional satisfaction. Conclusions: Physician and APP collaborative care models are increasingly evolving to independent visits often driven by workloads, financial drivers, and local regulations such as medical staff rules and hospital bylaws. Understanding which staffing models produce optimal patient, clinician, and organizational outcomes should inform billing policies rather than the reverse.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190465168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85190465168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jhm.13356
DO - 10.1002/jhm.13356
M3 - Article
C2 - 38598752
AN - SCOPUS:85190465168
SN - 1553-5592
VL - 19
SP - 486
EP - 494
JO - Journal of Hospital Medicine
JF - Journal of Hospital Medicine
IS - 6
ER -