Impact of NRAS mutations for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune therapies

Douglas B. Johnson*, Christine M. Lovly, Marisa Flavin, Katherine S. Panageas, Gregory D. Ayers, Zhiguo Zhao, Wade T. Iams, Marta Colgan, Sarah De Noble, Charles R. Terry, Elizabeth G. Berry, A. John Iafrate, Ryan J. Sullivan, Richard D. Carvajal, Jeffrey A. Sosman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

146 Scopus citations

Abstract

Activating NRAS mutations are found in 15% to 20% of melanomas. Immune therapies have become a mainstay in advanced melanoma treatment. We sought to evaluate whether tumor genotype (e.g., NRAS mutations) correlates with benefit from immune therapy in melanoma. We identified 229 patients with melanoma treated with immune therapies [IL2, ipilimumab, or anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1)] at three centers and compared clinical outcomes following immune therapy for patients with or without NRAS mutations. Of the 229 patients with melanoma, 60 had NRAS mutation, 53 had BRAF mutation, and 116 had NRAS/BRAF wild type. The NRAS-mutant cohort had superior or a trend to superior outcomes compared with the other cohorts in terms of response to first-line immune therapy (28% vs. 16%, P = 0.04), response to any line of immune therapy (32% vs. 20%, P = 0.07), clinical benefit (response + stable disease lasting >24 weeks; 50% vs. 31%, P < 0.01), and progression-free survival (median, 4.1 vs. 2.9 months, P = 0.09). Benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 was particularly marked in the NRAS cohort (clinical benefit rate 73% vs. 35%). In an independent group of patient samples, NRAS-mutant melanoma had higher PD-L1 expression (although not statistically significant) compared with other genotypes (8/12 vs. 9/20 samples with >1% expression; 6/12 vs. 6/20 samples with >5% expression), suggesting a potential mechanism for the clinical results. This retrospective study suggests that NRAS mutations in advanced melanoma correlate with increased benefit from immune-based therapies compared with other genetic subtypes. If confirmed by prospective studies, this may be explained in part by high rates of PD-L1 expression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-295
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Immunology Research
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2015

Funding

Grant Support This study was supported by NIH K12 CA0906525(to D.B. Johnson and C.M Lovly) and a Damon Runyon Clinical Investigator Award. J.A. Sosman was supported by an NIH K24 grant, an American Cancer Society Professorship, and an Ingram Professorship. The project described was supported by CTSA award no. UL1TR000445 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The MSKCC Sequenom facility was supported by the Anbinder Fund. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of NRAS mutations for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune therapies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this