TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation mapping
T2 - Using intervention mapping to develop implementation strategies
AU - Fernandez, Maria E.
AU - ten Hoor, Gill A.
AU - van Lieshout, Sanne
AU - Rodriguez, Serena A.
AU - Beidas, Rinad S.
AU - Parcel, Guy
AU - Ruiter, Robert A.C.
AU - Markham, Christine M.
AU - Kok, Gerjo
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of our late colleague, L. Kay Bartholomew Eldredge, the lead creator of Intervention Mapping. We also wish to acknowledge the work of other colleagues such as Nell Gottlieb, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Melissa Peskin, Belinda Hernandez, Linda Highfield, Andrew Springer, Melissa Valerio, Lara Staub Savas, Cam Escoffrey, Byron Powell, and others who have applied Intervention Mapping for the adaption and implementation of interventions and whose work and suggestions have helped improve the process. We also wish to thank Kelly McGauhey and Marsha Lee for editorial assistance.SR was supported by a predoctoral fellowship from the University of Texas School of Public Health Cancer Education and Career Development Program-National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health Grant R25 CA57712. MF was partially supported by the National Cancer Institute 1 R01/CA 163526 and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services contract/grant number R18HS023255-03.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Fernandez, ten Hoor, van Lieshout, Rodriguez, Beidas, Parcel, Ruiter, Markham and Kok.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: The ultimate impact of a health innovation depends not only on its effectiveness but also on its reach in the population and the extent to which it is implemented with high levels of completeness and fidelity. Implementation science has emerged as the potential solution to the failure to translate evidence from research into effective practice and policy evident in many fields. Implementation scientists have developed many frameworks, theories and models, which describe implementation determinants, processes, or outcomes; yet, there is little guidance about how these can inform the development or selection of implementation strategies (methods or techniques used to improve adoption, implementation, sustainment, and scale-up of interventions) (1, 2). To move the implementation science field forward and to provide a practical tool to apply the knowledge in this field, we describe a systematic process for planning or selecting implementation strategies: Implementation Mapping. Methods: Implementation Mapping is based on Intervention Mapping (a six-step protocol that guides the design of multi-level health promotion interventions and implementation strategies) and expands on Intervention Mapping step 5. It includes insights from both the implementation science field and Intervention Mapping. Implementation Mapping involves five tasks: (1) conduct an implementation needs assessment and identify program adopters and implementers; (2) state adoption and implementation outcomes and performance objectives, identify determinants, and create matrices of change objectives; (3) choose theoretical methods (mechanisms of change) and select or design implementation strategies; (4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and (5) evaluate implementation outcomes. The tasks are iterative with the planner circling back to previous steps throughout this process to ensure all adopters and implementers, outcomes, determinants, and objectives are addressed. Discussion: Implementation Mapping provides a systematic process for developing strategies to improve the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings.
AB - Background: The ultimate impact of a health innovation depends not only on its effectiveness but also on its reach in the population and the extent to which it is implemented with high levels of completeness and fidelity. Implementation science has emerged as the potential solution to the failure to translate evidence from research into effective practice and policy evident in many fields. Implementation scientists have developed many frameworks, theories and models, which describe implementation determinants, processes, or outcomes; yet, there is little guidance about how these can inform the development or selection of implementation strategies (methods or techniques used to improve adoption, implementation, sustainment, and scale-up of interventions) (1, 2). To move the implementation science field forward and to provide a practical tool to apply the knowledge in this field, we describe a systematic process for planning or selecting implementation strategies: Implementation Mapping. Methods: Implementation Mapping is based on Intervention Mapping (a six-step protocol that guides the design of multi-level health promotion interventions and implementation strategies) and expands on Intervention Mapping step 5. It includes insights from both the implementation science field and Intervention Mapping. Implementation Mapping involves five tasks: (1) conduct an implementation needs assessment and identify program adopters and implementers; (2) state adoption and implementation outcomes and performance objectives, identify determinants, and create matrices of change objectives; (3) choose theoretical methods (mechanisms of change) and select or design implementation strategies; (4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and (5) evaluate implementation outcomes. The tasks are iterative with the planner circling back to previous steps throughout this process to ensure all adopters and implementers, outcomes, determinants, and objectives are addressed. Discussion: Implementation Mapping provides a systematic process for developing strategies to improve the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Adoption
KW - Dissemination
KW - Health promotion
KW - Implementation
KW - Implementation strategies
KW - Intervention mapping
KW - Mechanisms of change
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068816090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068816090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158
M3 - Article
C2 - 31275915
AN - SCOPUS:85068816090
SN - 2296-2565
VL - 7
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
IS - JUN
M1 - 158
ER -