Implementation of a culturally competent APOL1 genetic testing programme into living donor evaluation: A two-site, non-randomised, pre-post trial design

Justin D. Smith, Akansha Agrawal, Catherine Wicklund, Debra Duquette, John Friedewald, Luke V. Rasmussen, Jessica Gacki-Smith, S. Darius Tandon, Lutfiyya N. Muhammad, Clyde W. Yancy, Siyuan Dong, Matthew Cooper, Alexander Gilbert, Aneesha Shetty, Elisa J. Gordon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction While living donor (LD) kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with kidney failure, LDs assume a higher risk of future kidney failure themselves. LDs of African ancestry have an even greater risk of kidney failure post-donation than White LDs. Because evidence suggests that Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk variants contribute to this greater risk, transplant nephrologists are increasingly using APOL1 genetic testing to evaluate LD candidates of African ancestry. However, nephrologists do not consistently perform genetic counselling with LD candidates about APOL1 due to a lack of knowledge and skill in counselling. Without proper counselling, APOL1 testing will magnify LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, jeopardising their informed consent. Given cultural concerns about genetic testing among people of African ancestry, protecting LD candidates' safety is essential to improve informed decisions about donating. Clinical 'chatbots', mobile apps that provide genetic information to patients, can improve informed treatment decisions. No chatbot on APOL1 is available and no nephrologist training programmes are available to provide culturally competent counselling to LDs about APOL1. Given the shortage of genetic counsellors, increasing nephrologists' genetic literacy is critical to integrating genetic testing into practice. Methods and analysis Using a non-randomised, pre-post trial design in two transplant centres (Chicago, IL, and Washington, DC), we will evaluate the effectiveness of culturally competent APOL1 testing, chatbot and counselling on LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, preparedness for decision-making, willingness to donate and satisfaction with informed consent and longitudinally evaluate the implementation of this intervention into clinical practice using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework. Ethics and dissemination This study will create a model for APOL1 testing of LDs of African ancestry, which can be implemented nationally via implementation science approaches. APOL1 will serve as a model for integrating culturally competent genetic testing into transplant and other practices to improve informed consent. This study involves human participants and was approved by Northwestern University IRB (STU00214038). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04910867. Registered 8 May 2021, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S000AWZ6&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0001PPF&ts=7&cx=-8jv7m2 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04999436. Registered 5 November 2021, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S000AYWW&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0001PPF&ts=11&cx=9tny7v

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere067657
JournalBMJ open
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2023

Funding

This study is supported by grant 1R01DK128207-01 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, awarded to Elisa J. Gordon. Additional support was provided by a grant from The Northwestern Medicine Dixon Translational Research Innovation Award awarded to Elisa J. Gordon, and the Alliance for Research in Chicagoland Communities/Northwestern University Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute Community-Engaged Research Partnership Development Seed Grant awarded to Elisa J. Gordon and Jacqueline Burgess-Bishop. The opinions expressed herein are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases or any other part of the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Keywords

  • ETHICS (see Medical Ethics)
  • End stage renal failure
  • GENETICS
  • Organisation of health services
  • QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
  • Renal transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of a culturally competent APOL1 genetic testing programme into living donor evaluation: A two-site, non-randomised, pre-post trial design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this