Implementation of an antenatal late-preterm corticosteroid protocol at a high-volume tertiary care center

Nevert Badreldin, Grace G. Willert, Andrea A. Henricks, Alan Peaceman, Leslie A. Caldarelli, Lynn M. Yee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Background: Since publication of the sentinel antenatal late-preterm steroids clinical trial, the use of antenatal steroids has become a routine aspect of the management of pregnancies at risk for late-preterm delivery. However, in practice, the administration of antenatal corticosteroids in the late-preterm period is widely varied across provider and institution, and the process of implementation of this new practice as well as outcomes associated with implementation are not well understood. Objective: The objective was to evaluate institutional adherence to an antenatal late-preterm corticosteroid protocol and to assess neonatal outcomes associated with its introduction. Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton pregnancies admitted between 34 and 36 5/7 weeks’ who presented in the year before (“preprotocol”: November 2012 to October 2013) and after implementation (“postprotocol”: April 2016 to March 2017). The protocol recommends corticosteroid administration to women 34 to 36 5/7 weeks’ gestation at risk for preterm birth who have not received prior corticosteroids. Women with fetal anomalies or pregestational or gestational diabetes were excluded from analysis. The frequency with which eligible women received corticosteroids and ineligible women were appropriately excluded (adherence) was calculated on a monthly basis. Neonatal outcomes of interest were hypoglycemia, receipt of dextrose, birthweight, 5-minute Apgar less than 7, receipt of surfactant, respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, neonatal intensive care unit length of stay, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, culture-positive sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and death. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to compare neonatal outcomes between (1) all women in the postprotocol cohort to those in the preprotocol cohort and (2) only women who received adherent care in the postprotocol cohort to all women in the preprotocol cohort. Results: A total of 452 women were included in the preprotocol cohort and 451 in the postprotocol cohort. The majority of the postprotocol women (n = 366, 81.2%) received adherent care. Women in both cohorts were similar, with the exception that women in the postprotocol cohort were more likely to be nulliparous (P = .013). Compared to the preprotocol period, neonates of women in the postprotocol period had significantly higher odds of hypoglycemia <50 mg/dL in the first 24 hours of life (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–1.80), without improvements in respiratory outcomes. Results were similar when restricting the analysis to only women in the postprotocol cohort who received adherent care (glucose <50 mg/dL: adjusted odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–2.03). No differences in composite respiratory morbidity or other neonatal outcomes were observed. Conclusion: Uptake of a new institutional protocol for antenatal late-preterm corticosteroids was rapid. Compared with historic controls, neonates exposed to antenatal late-preterm corticosteroid experienced increased odds of hypoglycemia, without significant improvements in respiratory morbidities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100076
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2020


  • antenatal late-preterm steroids
  • corticosteroids
  • late-preterm delivery
  • neonatal hypoglycemia
  • neonatal respiratory outcomes
  • protocol implementation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of an antenatal late-preterm corticosteroid protocol at a high-volume tertiary care center'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this