TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation research priorities for addressing the maternal health crisis in the USA
T2 - results from a modified Delphi study among researchers
AU - Implementation Science for Maternal Health National Working Group
AU - Hamm, Rebecca F.
AU - Moniz, Michelle H.
AU - Wahid, Inaya
AU - Breman, Rachel Blankstein
AU - Callaghan-Koru, Jennifer A.
AU - Allyse, Megan
AU - Bennet, Ian
AU - Bingham, Debra
AU - Blackman, Kacie
AU - Brewer, Sarah
AU - Cochran, Jerry
AU - Creanga, Andreea
AU - Cunningham, Shayna
AU - Daley, Ellen
AU - DeSisto, Carla
AU - Farahi, Narges
AU - Franck, Linda
AU - Goff, Sarah
AU - Griner, Stacey
AU - Haider, Sadia
AU - Hansen, Anna
AU - Harden, Samantha
AU - Harper, Kimberly
AU - Hofler, Lisa
AU - Horvath, Sarah
AU - Ickovics, Jeanette
AU - Johnson, Jennifer
AU - Kaplan, Heather
AU - Kroelinger, Charlan
AU - Larson, Elysia
AU - Le, Huynh Nhu (Mimi)
AU - Lee, Henry
AU - McAlearney, Ann
AU - McCarthy, Danielle
AU - McCloskey, Lois
AU - Meghea, Cristian
AU - Miller, Emily
AU - Mollard, Elizabeth (Libby)
AU - Moore Simas, Tiffany
AU - Moses-Kolko, Eydie
AU - Novick, Gina
AU - Palmer Molina, Abigail
AU - Patel, Divya
AU - Qasba, Neena
AU - Raghuraman, Nandini
AU - Romano, Amy
AU - Rosenstein, Melissa
AU - Sheth, Sangini
AU - Simon, Melissa
AU - Yee, Lynn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: Maternal health outcomes in the USA are far worse than in peer nations. Increasing implementation research in maternity care is critical to addressing quality gaps and unwarranted variations in care. Implementation research priorities have not yet been defined or well represented in the plans for maternal health research investments in the USA. Methods: This descriptive study used a modified Delphi method to solicit and rank research priorities at the intersection of implementation science and maternal health through two sequential web-based surveys. A purposeful, yet broad sample of researchers with relevant subject matter knowledge was identified through searches of published articles and grant databases. The surveys addressed five implementation research areas in maternal health: (1) practices to prioritize for broader implementation, (2) practices to prioritize for de-implementation, (3) research questions about implementation determinants, (4) research questions about implementation strategies, and (5) research questions about methods/measures. Results: Of 160 eligible researchers, 82 (51.2%) agreed to participate. Participants were predominantly female (90%) and White (75%). Sixty completed at least one of two surveys. The practices that participants prioritized for broader implementation were improved postpartum care, perinatal and postpartum mood disorder screening and management, and standardized management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. For de-implementation, practices believed to be most impactful if removed from or reduced in maternity care were cesarean delivery for low-risk patients and routine discontinuation of all psychiatric medications during pregnancy. The top methodological priorities of participants were improving the extent to which implementation science frameworks and measures address equity and developing approaches for involving patients in implementation research. Conclusions: Through a web-based Delphi exercise, we identified implementation research priorities that researchers consider to have the greatest potential to improve the quality of maternity care in the USA. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of using modified Delphi approaches to engage researchers in setting implementation research priorities within a clinical area.
AB - Background: Maternal health outcomes in the USA are far worse than in peer nations. Increasing implementation research in maternity care is critical to addressing quality gaps and unwarranted variations in care. Implementation research priorities have not yet been defined or well represented in the plans for maternal health research investments in the USA. Methods: This descriptive study used a modified Delphi method to solicit and rank research priorities at the intersection of implementation science and maternal health through two sequential web-based surveys. A purposeful, yet broad sample of researchers with relevant subject matter knowledge was identified through searches of published articles and grant databases. The surveys addressed five implementation research areas in maternal health: (1) practices to prioritize for broader implementation, (2) practices to prioritize for de-implementation, (3) research questions about implementation determinants, (4) research questions about implementation strategies, and (5) research questions about methods/measures. Results: Of 160 eligible researchers, 82 (51.2%) agreed to participate. Participants were predominantly female (90%) and White (75%). Sixty completed at least one of two surveys. The practices that participants prioritized for broader implementation were improved postpartum care, perinatal and postpartum mood disorder screening and management, and standardized management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. For de-implementation, practices believed to be most impactful if removed from or reduced in maternity care were cesarean delivery for low-risk patients and routine discontinuation of all psychiatric medications during pregnancy. The top methodological priorities of participants were improving the extent to which implementation science frameworks and measures address equity and developing approaches for involving patients in implementation research. Conclusions: Through a web-based Delphi exercise, we identified implementation research priorities that researchers consider to have the greatest potential to improve the quality of maternity care in the USA. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of using modified Delphi approaches to engage researchers in setting implementation research priorities within a clinical area.
KW - Delphi method
KW - Implementation science
KW - Maternal health
KW - Priority setting
KW - Research priorities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165603865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165603865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s43058-023-00461-z
DO - 10.1186/s43058-023-00461-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 37480135
AN - SCOPUS:85165603865
SN - 2662-2211
VL - 4
JO - Implementation Science Communications
JF - Implementation Science Communications
IS - 1
M1 - 83
ER -