TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving inpatients' identification of their doctors
T2 - Use of FACE™ cards
AU - Arora, Vineet M.
AU - Schaninger, Caitlin
AU - D'Arcy, Michael
AU - Johnson, Julie K.
AU - Humphrey, Holly J.
AU - Woodruff, James N.
AU - Meltzer, David O.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by funding from the Graduate Medical Education Committee from the University of Chicago Medical Center. The authors also acknowledge funding by the Hartford Foundation Health Outcomes Research Scholars Award, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics ( 1U18HS016967-01 ), the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation, and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Effectiveness of TEACH Research grant ( 1 RO1 GM075292-01 ). Previous presentations on these data include the Society of Hospital Medicine Conference in San Diego, on April 4, 2008. The authors thank Jeanne Farnan, M.D.; Kathleen Santos, M.S.; Hui Tang, M.S.; Juned Siddique, Ph.D.; Korry Schwanz; Kim Alvarez; Stan Robinson (Environmental Services); Denise Vasquez, R.N.; and Jen Higa.
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - Background: Improving patients' ability to identify their inpatient physicians and understand their roles is vital to safe patient care. Picture cards were designed to facilitate physician introductions. The effect of Feedback Care and Evaluation (FACE™) cards on patients' ability to correctly identify their inpatient physicians and on patients understanding of physicians roles was assessed. Methods: In October 2006, team members introduced themselves with FACE cards, which included a photo and an explanation of their roles. During an inpatient interview, research assistants asked patients to name their inpatient physicians and trainees and to rate their understanding of their physicians' roles. Results: Of 2,100 eligible patients, 1,686 (80%) patients participated in the baseline period, and 857 (67%) of the 1,278 patients in the intervention period participated in the evaluation. With the FACE intervention, patients were significandy more likely to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician (attending, resident, or intern; baseline 12.5% versus intervention 21.1%; p < .001). Of the 181 patients who were able to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician in the intervention period, research assistants noted that 59% (107) had FACE cards visible in their rooms. Surprisingly, fewer patients rated their understanding of their physicians' roles as excellent or very good in the intervention period (45.6%) compared with the baseline period (55.3%; p < .001). Discussion: Although FACE cards improved patients' ability to identify their inpatient physicians, many patients still could not identify their inpatient doctors. FACE cards may have served as a reminder to physicians to introduce themselves to their patients. The FACE cards also served to highlight patients' misunderstanding of their physicians' roles.
AB - Background: Improving patients' ability to identify their inpatient physicians and understand their roles is vital to safe patient care. Picture cards were designed to facilitate physician introductions. The effect of Feedback Care and Evaluation (FACE™) cards on patients' ability to correctly identify their inpatient physicians and on patients understanding of physicians roles was assessed. Methods: In October 2006, team members introduced themselves with FACE cards, which included a photo and an explanation of their roles. During an inpatient interview, research assistants asked patients to name their inpatient physicians and trainees and to rate their understanding of their physicians' roles. Results: Of 2,100 eligible patients, 1,686 (80%) patients participated in the baseline period, and 857 (67%) of the 1,278 patients in the intervention period participated in the evaluation. With the FACE intervention, patients were significandy more likely to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician (attending, resident, or intern; baseline 12.5% versus intervention 21.1%; p < .001). Of the 181 patients who were able to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician in the intervention period, research assistants noted that 59% (107) had FACE cards visible in their rooms. Surprisingly, fewer patients rated their understanding of their physicians' roles as excellent or very good in the intervention period (45.6%) compared with the baseline period (55.3%; p < .001). Discussion: Although FACE cards improved patients' ability to identify their inpatient physicians, many patients still could not identify their inpatient doctors. FACE cards may have served as a reminder to physicians to introduce themselves to their patients. The FACE cards also served to highlight patients' misunderstanding of their physicians' roles.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74949086717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74949086717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1553-7250(09)35086-2
DO - 10.1016/S1553-7250(09)35086-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 20043501
AN - SCOPUS:74949086717
SN - 1553-7250
VL - 35
SP - 613
EP - 619
JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
IS - 12
ER -