Improving the Health of Cisgender Men Who Identify as Bisexual: What Do They Want from Interventions?

Brian Feinstein, Brian Dodge, Aaron K. Korpak, Michael Newcomb, Brian Mustanski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Self-identified bisexual men are at increased risk for negative health outcomes, but there are no interventions tailored to their unique needs. In order to develop interventions for this population, it is first necessary to understand their preferences. As part of a larger study, 128 cisgender men who identified as bisexual reported on their preferences for different intervention components. Large proportions of participants prioritized addressing both health (e.g., mental health, HIV/STI) and psychosocial experiences (e.g., dating/relationships, discrimination/victimization). A slightly larger proportion of participants preferred an intervention for gay and bisexual men together compared to an intervention for bisexual men only. However, those who reported more discrimination and recent female sexual partners were more likely to prefer an intervention for bisexual men only. Larger proportions of participants preferred a group intervention compared to an individual intervention and an in-person intervention compared to an online intervention. These findings highlight the importance of addressing both health and psychosocial experiences in tailored interventions for self-identified bisexual men. Further, while in-person and group interventions may appeal to larger proportions of self-identified bisexual men, the appeal of an intervention for gay and bisexual men together compared to an intervention for bisexual men only may depend on individual and social/contextual factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSexuality Research and Social Policy
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Men's Health
health
Health
Sexual Minorities
appeal
discrimination
Crime Victims
Sexual Partners
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
human being
Mental Health
victimization

Keywords

  • Bisexual
  • Health
  • Intervention preferences
  • Sexual identity
  • Sexual orientation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{df55b96f43d6422093d54a52de81b701,
title = "Improving the Health of Cisgender Men Who Identify as Bisexual: What Do They Want from Interventions?",
abstract = "Self-identified bisexual men are at increased risk for negative health outcomes, but there are no interventions tailored to their unique needs. In order to develop interventions for this population, it is first necessary to understand their preferences. As part of a larger study, 128 cisgender men who identified as bisexual reported on their preferences for different intervention components. Large proportions of participants prioritized addressing both health (e.g., mental health, HIV/STI) and psychosocial experiences (e.g., dating/relationships, discrimination/victimization). A slightly larger proportion of participants preferred an intervention for gay and bisexual men together compared to an intervention for bisexual men only. However, those who reported more discrimination and recent female sexual partners were more likely to prefer an intervention for bisexual men only. Larger proportions of participants preferred a group intervention compared to an individual intervention and an in-person intervention compared to an online intervention. These findings highlight the importance of addressing both health and psychosocial experiences in tailored interventions for self-identified bisexual men. Further, while in-person and group interventions may appeal to larger proportions of self-identified bisexual men, the appeal of an intervention for gay and bisexual men together compared to an intervention for bisexual men only may depend on individual and social/contextual factors.",
keywords = "Bisexual, Health, Intervention preferences, Sexual identity, Sexual orientation",
author = "Brian Feinstein and Brian Dodge and Korpak, {Aaron K.} and Michael Newcomb and Brian Mustanski",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13178-019-0380-2",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC",
issn = "1868-9884",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the Health of Cisgender Men Who Identify as Bisexual

T2 - What Do They Want from Interventions?

AU - Feinstein, Brian

AU - Dodge, Brian

AU - Korpak, Aaron K.

AU - Newcomb, Michael

AU - Mustanski, Brian

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Self-identified bisexual men are at increased risk for negative health outcomes, but there are no interventions tailored to their unique needs. In order to develop interventions for this population, it is first necessary to understand their preferences. As part of a larger study, 128 cisgender men who identified as bisexual reported on their preferences for different intervention components. Large proportions of participants prioritized addressing both health (e.g., mental health, HIV/STI) and psychosocial experiences (e.g., dating/relationships, discrimination/victimization). A slightly larger proportion of participants preferred an intervention for gay and bisexual men together compared to an intervention for bisexual men only. However, those who reported more discrimination and recent female sexual partners were more likely to prefer an intervention for bisexual men only. Larger proportions of participants preferred a group intervention compared to an individual intervention and an in-person intervention compared to an online intervention. These findings highlight the importance of addressing both health and psychosocial experiences in tailored interventions for self-identified bisexual men. Further, while in-person and group interventions may appeal to larger proportions of self-identified bisexual men, the appeal of an intervention for gay and bisexual men together compared to an intervention for bisexual men only may depend on individual and social/contextual factors.

AB - Self-identified bisexual men are at increased risk for negative health outcomes, but there are no interventions tailored to their unique needs. In order to develop interventions for this population, it is first necessary to understand their preferences. As part of a larger study, 128 cisgender men who identified as bisexual reported on their preferences for different intervention components. Large proportions of participants prioritized addressing both health (e.g., mental health, HIV/STI) and psychosocial experiences (e.g., dating/relationships, discrimination/victimization). A slightly larger proportion of participants preferred an intervention for gay and bisexual men together compared to an intervention for bisexual men only. However, those who reported more discrimination and recent female sexual partners were more likely to prefer an intervention for bisexual men only. Larger proportions of participants preferred a group intervention compared to an individual intervention and an in-person intervention compared to an online intervention. These findings highlight the importance of addressing both health and psychosocial experiences in tailored interventions for self-identified bisexual men. Further, while in-person and group interventions may appeal to larger proportions of self-identified bisexual men, the appeal of an intervention for gay and bisexual men together compared to an intervention for bisexual men only may depend on individual and social/contextual factors.

KW - Bisexual

KW - Health

KW - Intervention preferences

KW - Sexual identity

KW - Sexual orientation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061916399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061916399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13178-019-0380-2

DO - 10.1007/s13178-019-0380-2

M3 - Article

JO - Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC

JF - Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC

SN - 1868-9884

ER -