In defense of policy polling: Rejoinder to bishop

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Contrary to George Bishop's claim, collective deliberation and cue-taking permit even poorly informed individuals to form opinions that can accurately reflect their values and interests in light of available information. Statistical aggregation of poll results can smooth out offsetting errors and uncertainties and reveal collective preferences that are real, stable, consistent, coherent, differentiated, and responsive to information: preferences that policy makers should pay attention to. Media polls tend to be more useful for this purpose than academic surveys that encourage don't know responses and use information-based filters that bias estimates of collective preferences against lower-income citizens, minorities, and others who tend to be less well informed. Media polls frequently ask about specific policy issues relevant to policy makers. Even biased poll questions of certain kinds can provide useful information about collective policy preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-165
Number of pages7
JournalCritical Review
Issue number1-2
StatePublished - Mar 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Literature and Literary Theory


Dive into the research topics of 'In defense of policy polling: Rejoinder to bishop'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this