TY - JOUR
T1 - In vitro comparative biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw instrumentations in the lumbar region of the human spine
AU - Gwon, J. K.
AU - Chen, J.
AU - Lim, T. H.
AU - Han, J. S.
AU - Weinstein, James Neil
AU - Goel, V. K.
PY - 1991/12
Y1 - 1991/12
N2 - An analysis of the load-displacement behavior of stabilized spines in comparison with intact spines was undertaken using fresh human cadaveric spines (T 12/Ll—sacrum). The three-dimensional load-displacement data of the five vertebral bodies of an intact specimen in clinically relevant loading cases were recorded using the Selspot II motion measuring system. After testing the intact specimen, an instability was created at the L4-5 level. The unstable motion segment was stabilized sequentially with three transpedicular screw instrumentations. The stabilized specimens were tested, and the data for the stabilized tests were normalized with respect to the intact data to determine the degree of stabilization achieved in various loading modes as a function of the three devices. The results showed that the three transpedicular devices included in this study were effective in imparting stability to the injured ligamentous spinal segment at a p < 0.01 level of significance. The differences among the devices were not significant.
AB - An analysis of the load-displacement behavior of stabilized spines in comparison with intact spines was undertaken using fresh human cadaveric spines (T 12/Ll—sacrum). The three-dimensional load-displacement data of the five vertebral bodies of an intact specimen in clinically relevant loading cases were recorded using the Selspot II motion measuring system. After testing the intact specimen, an instability was created at the L4-5 level. The unstable motion segment was stabilized sequentially with three transpedicular screw instrumentations. The stabilized specimens were tested, and the data for the stabilized tests were normalized with respect to the intact data to determine the degree of stabilization achieved in various loading modes as a function of the three devices. The results showed that the three transpedicular devices included in this study were effective in imparting stability to the injured ligamentous spinal segment at a p < 0.01 level of significance. The differences among the devices were not significant.
KW - Comparative biomechanical analysis
KW - Finite element models
KW - Load-displacement characteristics
KW - Segmental instability
KW - Transpedicular screw devices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026320064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026320064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00002517-199112000-00005
DO - 10.1097/00002517-199112000-00005
M3 - Article
C2 - 1810566
AN - SCOPUS:0026320064
SN - 0895-0385
VL - 4
SP - 437
EP - 443
JO - Journal of Spinal Disorders
JF - Journal of Spinal Disorders
IS - 4
ER -