@article{c958e0fabac945bb828a6e5954b37257,
title = "Incoming medical students' political orientation affects outcomes related to care of marginalized groups: Results from the medical student CHANGES study",
abstract = "This article characterizes the political ideology of first-year medical students and describes the extent to which their political ideology was associated with attitudes and beliefs related to the care of marginalized patients assessed during their fourth year. Analyses use data fromonline questionnaires administered to 3,756medical students from a stratified random sample of forty-nine medical schools in their first and fourth years of study. The primary measure of political ideology was a five-point scale anchored by {"}very conservative{"} and {"}very liberal.{"} Mixed-effects linear regression was used to test the predictive power of political ideology at year 1 on year 4 outcomes. Among incoming medical students, 47.7% identified as liberal, 33.3% as moderate, and 19.0% as conservative. More conservative ideology was associated at year 4 with greater implicit bias against black and gay individuals, more negative explicit attitudes toward stigmatized groups, lower internal motivation to control racial prejudice, lower levels of trait empathy and empathy toward patients, and lower levels of patientcentered attitudes. Future research is needed to inform and develop interventions to improve care of patients from marginalized groups that are effective for medical students and health care providers across the political spectrum.",
keywords = "Health care disparities, Implicit bias, Medical education, Stigmatization",
author = "Burgess, {Diana J.} and Hardeman, {Rachel R.} and Burke, {Sara E.} and Cunningham, {Brooke A.} and Dovidio, {John F.} and Nelson, {David B.} and Perry, {Sylvia P.} and Phelan, {Sean M.} and Yeazel, {Mark W.} and Jeph Herrin and Ryn, {Michelle van}",
note = "Funding Information: We thank Deborah Finstad for data acquisition and management and Yuefeng Hou for assistance with statistical analyses. We are not sharing data at this time because the study is ongoing (we are following the cohort through residency). We did not preregister this research with an independent, institutional registry. Support for this research was provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health under award R01 HL085631. R.R.H. was additionally supported by the NHLBI Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research of the NIH under award 3 R01 HL085631-02S2 and through the Veterans Affairs Associated Health Postdoctoral Fellowship Training Program. S.P.P. was further supported by the NHLBI through a Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research (R01HL085631-S). Support was also provided by resources and use of facilities at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 by Duke University Press.",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-7206755",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "113--146",
journal = "Journal of health politics, policy and law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "1",
}