Incomplete Opening of LGM (Vena Tech) Filters Inserted via the Transjugular Approach

R. A. Reed; G. P. Teitelbaum; F. C. Taylor; R. C. Vogelzang; J. W. Yedlicka; M. J. Pentecost; W. R. Castaneda-Zuniga; K. Amplatz

doi:10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72215-X

Incomplete Opening of LGM (Vena Tech) Filters Inserted via the Transjugular Approach

R. A. Reed, G. P. Teitelbaum, F. C. Taylor, R. C. Vogelzang, J. W. Yedlicka, M. J. Pentecost, W. R. Castaneda-Zuniga, K. Amplatz

Radiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over a 12-month period, 216 LGM vena caval filters were placed in 216 patients at four institutions. The transjugular approach was used in 31 of 216 insertions (14%); 185 of 216 filters (86%) were inserted via the femoral route. Incomplete opening of filters was encountered in 13 of 31 transjugular insertions (41%) and none of 185 transfemoral insertions. Delayed spontaneous filter opening occurred in three of 12 cases (25%) of incomplete opening (in which follow-up was available) at 5 minutes, 4 days, and 2 months after insertion. One filter opened completely after catheter manipulations. Several mechanisms explaining this complication are proposed. In its present form, the LGM filter should not be inserted via the jugular route. Since the filtering capabilities of the incompletely opened LGM device have been shown to be diminished in vitro, it may be advisable to place a second filter cephalad to an incompletely opened LGM filter.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	441-445
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume	2
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72215-X
State	Published - Jan 1 1991

Keywords

Embolism, pulmonary, 60.72
IVC
LG-Medical
LGM
PE
Venae cavae, filters, 982.1299 Venae cavae, thrombosis, 982.442
inferior vena cava
pulmonary embolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72215-X

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Incomplete Opening of LGM (Vena Tech) Filters Inserted via the Transjugular Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Reed, R. A., Teitelbaum, G. P., Taylor, F. C., Vogelzang, R. C., Yedlicka, J. W., Pentecost, M. J., Castaneda-Zuniga, W. R., & Amplatz, K. (1991). Incomplete Opening of LGM (Vena Tech) Filters Inserted via the Transjugular Approach. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2(4), 441-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72215-X

@article{ccc2869026e44e46a19fb52c2e66ee2b,

title = "Incomplete Opening of LGM (Vena Tech) Filters Inserted via the Transjugular Approach",

abstract = "Over a 12-month period, 216 LGM vena caval filters were placed in 216 patients at four institutions. The transjugular approach was used in 31 of 216 insertions (14%); 185 of 216 filters (86%) were inserted via the femoral route. Incomplete opening of filters was encountered in 13 of 31 transjugular insertions (41%) and none of 185 transfemoral insertions. Delayed spontaneous filter opening occurred in three of 12 cases (25%) of incomplete opening (in which follow-up was available) at 5 minutes, 4 days, and 2 months after insertion. One filter opened completely after catheter manipulations. Several mechanisms explaining this complication are proposed. In its present form, the LGM filter should not be inserted via the jugular route. Since the filtering capabilities of the incompletely opened LGM device have been shown to be diminished in vitro, it may be advisable to place a second filter cephalad to an incompletely opened LGM filter.",

keywords = "Embolism, pulmonary, 60.72, IVC, LG-Medical, LGM, PE, Venae cavae, filters, 982.1299 Venae cavae, thrombosis, 982.442, inferior vena cava, pulmonary embolism",

author = "Reed, {R. A.} and Teitelbaum, {G. P.} and Taylor, {F. C.} and Vogelzang, {R. C.} and Yedlicka, {J. W.} and Pentecost, {M. J.} and Castaneda-Zuniga, {W. R.} and K. Amplatz",

year = "1991",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72215-X",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2",

pages = "441--445",

journal = "Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology",

issn = "1051-0443",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incomplete Opening of LGM (Vena Tech) Filters Inserted via the Transjugular Approach

AU - Reed, R. A.

AU - Teitelbaum, G. P.

AU - Taylor, F. C.

AU - Vogelzang, R. C.

AU - Yedlicka, J. W.

AU - Pentecost, M. J.

AU - Castaneda-Zuniga, W. R.

AU - Amplatz, K.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Over a 12-month period, 216 LGM vena caval filters were placed in 216 patients at four institutions. The transjugular approach was used in 31 of 216 insertions (14%); 185 of 216 filters (86%) were inserted via the femoral route. Incomplete opening of filters was encountered in 13 of 31 transjugular insertions (41%) and none of 185 transfemoral insertions. Delayed spontaneous filter opening occurred in three of 12 cases (25%) of incomplete opening (in which follow-up was available) at 5 minutes, 4 days, and 2 months after insertion. One filter opened completely after catheter manipulations. Several mechanisms explaining this complication are proposed. In its present form, the LGM filter should not be inserted via the jugular route. Since the filtering capabilities of the incompletely opened LGM device have been shown to be diminished in vitro, it may be advisable to place a second filter cephalad to an incompletely opened LGM filter.

AB - Over a 12-month period, 216 LGM vena caval filters were placed in 216 patients at four institutions. The transjugular approach was used in 31 of 216 insertions (14%); 185 of 216 filters (86%) were inserted via the femoral route. Incomplete opening of filters was encountered in 13 of 31 transjugular insertions (41%) and none of 185 transfemoral insertions. Delayed spontaneous filter opening occurred in three of 12 cases (25%) of incomplete opening (in which follow-up was available) at 5 minutes, 4 days, and 2 months after insertion. One filter opened completely after catheter manipulations. Several mechanisms explaining this complication are proposed. In its present form, the LGM filter should not be inserted via the jugular route. Since the filtering capabilities of the incompletely opened LGM device have been shown to be diminished in vitro, it may be advisable to place a second filter cephalad to an incompletely opened LGM filter.

KW - Embolism, pulmonary, 60.72

KW - IVC

KW - LG-Medical

KW - LGM

KW - PE

KW - Venae cavae, filters, 982.1299 Venae cavae, thrombosis, 982.442

KW - inferior vena cava

KW - pulmonary embolism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026249112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026249112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72215-X

DO - 10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72215-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 1797209

AN - SCOPUS:0026249112

VL - 2

SP - 441

EP - 445

JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

SN - 1051-0443

IS - 4

ER -