Inconsequence of membrane choice in acute renal failure?

S. K. Mujais*, P. Ivanovich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The choice of hemodialysis membrane in acute renal failure has caused a heated debate, principally because of the dogmatism with which the results of preliminary clinical studies have been translated into prescription dictum. The issue, however, is not merely the limitations of these two studies, but rather the shift in emphasis they may have engendered in the approach to dialytic therapy in acute renal failure. Dogmatism based on limited or flawed data does not serve the interests of our patients, and the issue of hemodialysis in acute renal failure is far more complex than the exaggerated importance of membrane choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)454-455
Number of pages2
JournalArtificial Organs
Volume20
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jul 5 1996

Keywords

  • acute dialysis
  • acute renal failure
  • cellulosic membranes
  • membranes
  • synthetic membranes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Inconsequence of membrane choice in acute renal failure?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Mujais, S. K., & Ivanovich, P. (1996). Inconsequence of membrane choice in acute renal failure? Artificial Organs, 20(5), 454-455.