Inconsistency and possible habituation of CCK-induced satiety

Susan Mineka*, Charles T. Snowdon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rats injected daily with cholecystokinin initially inhibited food intake in the first 30 min after injection, but after several days showed an increase in food ingested to an amount that approached their preinjection baseline food intakes and that did not differ from that of rats injected with isotonic saline. This effect occurred with the synthetic C-terminal octapeptide of cholecystokinin and to a lesser extent with injections of natural cholecystokinin extract. It occurred with wet mash and to a lesser extent with liquid diets. When injections were spaced at twice per week, there was an inconsistent response to cholecystokinin but no evidence of habituation. This finding of possible habituation and inconsistent responding to repeated injections of cholecystokinin questions its role as a physiological satiety signal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-72
Number of pages8
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1978

Funding

1Supported by U.S.P.H.S. Grant AM 17,171 to CTS and a granftr om the University of Wisconsin Graduate School to SM. We thank Brian Hollander, D. J. Hyde, Timothy Koschmann, Yvonne Pola, and Timothy Weber for their assistance in these experiments. We also thank Richard Keesey for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and Lola Lopes for her statistical advice. Requests for reprints should be sent to Susan Mineka, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Charter and Johnson Streets, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.

Keywords

  • Cholecystokinin
  • Habituation
  • Inconsistency
  • Satiety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inconsistency and possible habituation of CCK-induced satiety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this