TY - JOUR
T1 - Increased regulation of medication compounding by state boards of pharmacy
AU - Reynolds, Kelly A.
AU - Ibrahim, Sarah A.
AU - Hellquist, Kristin A.
AU - Poon, Emily
AU - Alam, Murad
N1 - Funding Information:
The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Convention is a private, nongovernmental organization which independently develops guidelines for pharmaceuticals, which may or may not be enforced by state boards of pharmacy. USP General Chapters , , and provide quality standards for compounding and handling of non-sterile, sterile, and hazardous drugs, respectively []. Each chapter describes a number of specific requirements regarding management, testing, and storing of compounded medications []. USP Standards are generally supported by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the adulteration and misbranding provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [–]. However, although the FDA can enforce certain federal laws pertaining to compounding pharmacies, compounded drugs are not FDA approved, and the FDA does not evaluate their safety, effectiveness, or quality before they are distributed []. State boards of pharmacy are largely responsible for regulating compounded preparations [].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Medications may be specially prepared, or “compounded,” to meet the needs of patients who cannot use standard formulation. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Convention is a private, nongovernmental organization which independently develops guidelines for pharmaceuticals. The purpose of this survey study is to better understand the extent to which state boards of pharmacy currently incorporate relevant USP guidelines into their compounding regulations. Methods and findings: Executive directors or other administrative representatives of each state board of pharmacy were invited to respond to six open-ended questions. Their free text responses were analyzed by two reviewers (KR, SI) using qualitative research techniques. The response rate was 71% (36/51). Almost all (35/36, 97%) indicated that they implement USP compounding standards at least in part. Eighteen boards (18/28, 64%) reported that ‘some, but not all standards’ are enforced, most commonly < 795 > and < 797 > , but not < 800 > (9/28, 32%). Ten (10/28, 36%) indicated that ‘all’ USP compounding standards are enforced. Eighteen (18/21, 86%) only implement finalized USP standards, whereas three consider newly proposed chapters (3/21, 14%). Over half (22/36, 61%) employ a committee or similar process to select standards. Conclusions: Almost all responding state boards of pharmacy incorporate finalized USP compounding standards into their regulations, usually via a formal rulemaking process, with boards commonly implementing some standards but not all. Chapters < 795 > and < 797 > are implemented more commonly than < 800 >. Since Congress passed the Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), pharmacy boards are becoming increasingly observant of USP compounding standards.
AB - Background: Medications may be specially prepared, or “compounded,” to meet the needs of patients who cannot use standard formulation. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Convention is a private, nongovernmental organization which independently develops guidelines for pharmaceuticals. The purpose of this survey study is to better understand the extent to which state boards of pharmacy currently incorporate relevant USP guidelines into their compounding regulations. Methods and findings: Executive directors or other administrative representatives of each state board of pharmacy were invited to respond to six open-ended questions. Their free text responses were analyzed by two reviewers (KR, SI) using qualitative research techniques. The response rate was 71% (36/51). Almost all (35/36, 97%) indicated that they implement USP compounding standards at least in part. Eighteen boards (18/28, 64%) reported that ‘some, but not all standards’ are enforced, most commonly < 795 > and < 797 > , but not < 800 > (9/28, 32%). Ten (10/28, 36%) indicated that ‘all’ USP compounding standards are enforced. Eighteen (18/21, 86%) only implement finalized USP standards, whereas three consider newly proposed chapters (3/21, 14%). Over half (22/36, 61%) employ a committee or similar process to select standards. Conclusions: Almost all responding state boards of pharmacy incorporate finalized USP compounding standards into their regulations, usually via a formal rulemaking process, with boards commonly implementing some standards but not all. Chapters < 795 > and < 797 > are implemented more commonly than < 800 >. Since Congress passed the Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), pharmacy boards are becoming increasingly observant of USP compounding standards.
KW - Boards
KW - Compounding
KW - Medication
KW - Pharmacy
KW - Regulation
KW - State
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118186595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118186595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00403-021-02290-3
DO - 10.1007/s00403-021-02290-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 34698896
AN - SCOPUS:85118186595
SN - 0340-3696
VL - 314
SP - 787
EP - 790
JO - Archives of Dermatological Research
JF - Archives of Dermatological Research
IS - 8
ER -