Indirectly measuring evaluations of several attitude objects in relation to a neutral reference point

C. Miguel Brendl*, Arthur B. Markman, Claude Messner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article presents a new response time measure of evaluations, the Evaluative Movement Assessment (EMA). Two properties are verified for the first time in a response time measure: (a) mapping of multiple attitude objects to a single scale, and (b) centering that scale around a neutral point. Property (a) has implications when self-report and response time measures of attitudes have a low correlation. A study using EMA as an indirect measure revealed a low correlation with self-reported attitudes when the correlation reflected between-subjects differences in preferences for one attitude object to a second. Previously this result may have been interpreted as dissociation between two measures. However, when correlations from the same data reflected within-subject preference rank orders between multiple attitude objects, they were substantial (average r = .64). This result suggests that the presence of low correlations between self-report and response time measures in previous studies may be a reflection of methodological aspects of the response time measurement techniques. Property (b) has implications for exploring theoretical questions that require assessment of whether an evaluation is positive or negative (e.g., prejudice), because it allows such classifications in response time measurement to be made for the first time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)346-368
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Indirectly measuring evaluations of several attitude objects in relation to a neutral reference point'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this