TY - JOUR
T1 - Individual differences in gesture interpretation predict children's propensity to pick a gesturer as a good informant
AU - Wakefield, Elizabeth M.
AU - Novack, Miriam A.
AU - Congdon, Eliza L.
AU - Howard, Lauren H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this study was provided by Loyola University Chicago to E. Wakefield. The authors would like to thank Madeline Jurcev, Allison Haussler, Nema Shareef and Sasha Stojanovich for their help with data collection and coding, and undergraduate research assistants at Williams College for volunteering to be filmed for stimuli. The authors would also like to thank children and families who participated in this study while visiting the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago, and the museum for graciously allowing external researchers to conduct studies that would not be possible in other settings.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - To learn from others, children rely on cues (e.g., familiarity, confidence) to infer who around them will provide useful information. We extended this research to ask whether children will use an informant's inclination to gesture as a marker of whether or not the informant is a good person to learn from. Children (N = 459, ages 4–12 years) watched short videos in which actresses made statements accompanied by meaningful iconic gestures, beat gestures (which act as prosodic markers with speech), or no gestures. After each trial, children were asked “Who do you think would be a good teacher?” (good teacher [experimental] condition) or “Who do you think would be a good friend?” (good friend [control] condition). Results show that children do believe that someone who produces iconic gesture would make a good teacher compared with someone who does not, but this is only later in childhood and only if children have the propensity to see gesture as meaningful. The same effects were not found in the good friend condition, indicating that children's responses are not just about liking an adult who gestures more. These findings have implications for how children attend to and learn from instructional gesture.
AB - To learn from others, children rely on cues (e.g., familiarity, confidence) to infer who around them will provide useful information. We extended this research to ask whether children will use an informant's inclination to gesture as a marker of whether or not the informant is a good person to learn from. Children (N = 459, ages 4–12 years) watched short videos in which actresses made statements accompanied by meaningful iconic gestures, beat gestures (which act as prosodic markers with speech), or no gestures. After each trial, children were asked “Who do you think would be a good teacher?” (good teacher [experimental] condition) or “Who do you think would be a good friend?” (good friend [control] condition). Results show that children do believe that someone who produces iconic gesture would make a good teacher compared with someone who does not, but this is only later in childhood and only if children have the propensity to see gesture as meaningful. The same effects were not found in the good friend condition, indicating that children's responses are not just about liking an adult who gestures more. These findings have implications for how children attend to and learn from instructional gesture.
KW - Beat Gesture
KW - Early Childhood
KW - Iconic Gesture
KW - Individual Differences
KW - Learning, Informants
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099118981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099118981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105069
DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105069
M3 - Article
C2 - 33445006
AN - SCOPUS:85099118981
SN - 0022-0965
VL - 205
JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
M1 - 105069
ER -