Infection Control Practices among Interventional Radiologists: Results of an Online Survey

Pavani Reddy*, David Liebovitz, Howard Chrisman, Albert A. Nemcek, Gary A. Noskin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess current infection control practices of interventional radiologists (IRs) in the context of recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Materials and Methods: From November 2006 to January 2007, members of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) were invited to participate in an anonymous, online infection control questionnaire. Results: A total of 3,019 SIR members in the United States were contacted via e-mail, and 1,061 (35%) completed the 57-item survey. Of the respondents, 283 (25%) experienced a needlestick injury within the previous year, most often as a result of operator error (76%). Less than 65% reported compliance with annual tuberculosis skin testing; notably, those who received a yearly reminder were much more likely to receive annual testing than those who did not (odds ratio, 19.0; 95% CI, 12.6-28.7; P < .05). During central venous catheter placement, only 56% wore gowns, 50% wore caps, and 54% used full barrier precautions. Only 19% reported routine hand washing between glove applications. More than 40% noted a change in infection control practices within the previous 5 years, citing new hospital guidelines and recommendations by a professional organization as the reasons for change. Only 44% had infection control training at the onset of their practice. Conclusions: IRs demonstrate a wide variety of infection control practices that are not in accordance with current guidelines. IRs were most likely to change infection control practice if required to do so by their own hospitals or a professional organization. SIR can play an important role in the prevention of health care-associated infection by reinforcing current infection control guidelines as they pertain to interventional radiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1070-1074.e5
JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume20
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Infection Control
Interventional Radiology
Guidelines
cutaneous Tuberculosis
United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Needlestick Injuries
Hand Disinfection
Central Venous Catheters
Postal Service
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Cross Infection
Surveys and Questionnaires
Radiologists
Odds Ratio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{49e13cd200bb41288cef23e31434b846,
title = "Infection Control Practices among Interventional Radiologists: Results of an Online Survey",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess current infection control practices of interventional radiologists (IRs) in the context of recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Materials and Methods: From November 2006 to January 2007, members of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) were invited to participate in an anonymous, online infection control questionnaire. Results: A total of 3,019 SIR members in the United States were contacted via e-mail, and 1,061 (35{\%}) completed the 57-item survey. Of the respondents, 283 (25{\%}) experienced a needlestick injury within the previous year, most often as a result of operator error (76{\%}). Less than 65{\%} reported compliance with annual tuberculosis skin testing; notably, those who received a yearly reminder were much more likely to receive annual testing than those who did not (odds ratio, 19.0; 95{\%} CI, 12.6-28.7; P < .05). During central venous catheter placement, only 56{\%} wore gowns, 50{\%} wore caps, and 54{\%} used full barrier precautions. Only 19{\%} reported routine hand washing between glove applications. More than 40{\%} noted a change in infection control practices within the previous 5 years, citing new hospital guidelines and recommendations by a professional organization as the reasons for change. Only 44{\%} had infection control training at the onset of their practice. Conclusions: IRs demonstrate a wide variety of infection control practices that are not in accordance with current guidelines. IRs were most likely to change infection control practice if required to do so by their own hospitals or a professional organization. SIR can play an important role in the prevention of health care-associated infection by reinforcing current infection control guidelines as they pertain to interventional radiology.",
author = "Pavani Reddy and David Liebovitz and Howard Chrisman and Nemcek, {Albert A.} and Noskin, {Gary A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.071",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1070--1074.e5",
journal = "Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology",
issn = "1051-0443",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

Infection Control Practices among Interventional Radiologists : Results of an Online Survey. / Reddy, Pavani; Liebovitz, David; Chrisman, Howard; Nemcek, Albert A.; Noskin, Gary A.

In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 20, No. 8, 08.2009, p. 1070-1074.e5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infection Control Practices among Interventional Radiologists

T2 - Results of an Online Survey

AU - Reddy, Pavani

AU - Liebovitz, David

AU - Chrisman, Howard

AU - Nemcek, Albert A.

AU - Noskin, Gary A.

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Purpose: To assess current infection control practices of interventional radiologists (IRs) in the context of recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Materials and Methods: From November 2006 to January 2007, members of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) were invited to participate in an anonymous, online infection control questionnaire. Results: A total of 3,019 SIR members in the United States were contacted via e-mail, and 1,061 (35%) completed the 57-item survey. Of the respondents, 283 (25%) experienced a needlestick injury within the previous year, most often as a result of operator error (76%). Less than 65% reported compliance with annual tuberculosis skin testing; notably, those who received a yearly reminder were much more likely to receive annual testing than those who did not (odds ratio, 19.0; 95% CI, 12.6-28.7; P < .05). During central venous catheter placement, only 56% wore gowns, 50% wore caps, and 54% used full barrier precautions. Only 19% reported routine hand washing between glove applications. More than 40% noted a change in infection control practices within the previous 5 years, citing new hospital guidelines and recommendations by a professional organization as the reasons for change. Only 44% had infection control training at the onset of their practice. Conclusions: IRs demonstrate a wide variety of infection control practices that are not in accordance with current guidelines. IRs were most likely to change infection control practice if required to do so by their own hospitals or a professional organization. SIR can play an important role in the prevention of health care-associated infection by reinforcing current infection control guidelines as they pertain to interventional radiology.

AB - Purpose: To assess current infection control practices of interventional radiologists (IRs) in the context of recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Materials and Methods: From November 2006 to January 2007, members of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) were invited to participate in an anonymous, online infection control questionnaire. Results: A total of 3,019 SIR members in the United States were contacted via e-mail, and 1,061 (35%) completed the 57-item survey. Of the respondents, 283 (25%) experienced a needlestick injury within the previous year, most often as a result of operator error (76%). Less than 65% reported compliance with annual tuberculosis skin testing; notably, those who received a yearly reminder were much more likely to receive annual testing than those who did not (odds ratio, 19.0; 95% CI, 12.6-28.7; P < .05). During central venous catheter placement, only 56% wore gowns, 50% wore caps, and 54% used full barrier precautions. Only 19% reported routine hand washing between glove applications. More than 40% noted a change in infection control practices within the previous 5 years, citing new hospital guidelines and recommendations by a professional organization as the reasons for change. Only 44% had infection control training at the onset of their practice. Conclusions: IRs demonstrate a wide variety of infection control practices that are not in accordance with current guidelines. IRs were most likely to change infection control practice if required to do so by their own hospitals or a professional organization. SIR can play an important role in the prevention of health care-associated infection by reinforcing current infection control guidelines as they pertain to interventional radiology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651162195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651162195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.071

DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.071

M3 - Article

C2 - 19647184

AN - SCOPUS:67651162195

VL - 20

SP - 1070-1074.e5

JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

SN - 1051-0443

IS - 8

ER -