INFERRING RISK PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES USING CHOICE FROM INSURANCE MENUS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE

Keith Marzilli Ericson*, Philipp Kircher, Johannes Spinnewijn, Amanda Starc

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Demand for insurance can be driven by high risk aversion or high-risk.We show howto separately identify risk preferences and risk types using only choices frommenus of insurance plans. Our revealed preference approach does not rely on rational expectations, nor does it require access to claims data.We show what can be learned non-parametrically about the type distributions from variation in insurance plans, offered separately to random cross-sections or offered as part of the same menu to one cross-section. We prove that our approach allows for full identification in the textbook model with binary risks, and extend our results to continuous risks. We illustrate our approach using the Massachusetts Health InsuranceExchange,where choices provide informative bounds on the type distributions, especially for risks, but do not allow us to reject homogeneity in preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-744
Number of pages32
JournalEconomic Journal
Volume131
Issue number634
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'INFERRING RISK PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES USING CHOICE FROM INSURANCE MENUS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this