Influence of 2D rGO nanosheets on the properties of OPC paste

M. Murugan, Manu Santhanam*, Soujit Sen Gupta, T. Pradeep, Surendra P. Shah

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this experimental study, the effects of 2D reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets on the properties of Portland cement paste in comparison to popularly reviewed nanomaterials like aluminium oxide nanopowder (n-Al2O3) and colloidal silicon dioxide nanoparticles (n-SiO2) were investigated. The addition of 0.02% rGO sheets by weight of cement increased the 7 and 28 days flexural strength up to 70% and 23% respectively when compared to control paste. Moreover, its incorporation substantially decreased the sizes of pores/voids in the paste, even compared to the other nanomaterials, as characterized by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) and 3D X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) aided with image analysis technique. The assessment of Portlandite content by Thermo-gravimetric Analysis did not indicate major differences between the pastes, with the exception of the paste incorporating nano-silica. Microstructural analysis by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and Scanning Electron Microscopy did not reveal any major differences between the control paste and the pastes incorporating nanomaterials. The overall results suggest that the performance of rGO was better in comparison to other two nanomaterials, despite the significantly lower amounts that were used in the paste.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-59
Number of pages12
JournalCement and Concrete Composites
Volume70
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2016

Keywords

  • Mechanical properties
  • Nanocomposite
  • Pore structure
  • Reduced graphene oxide
  • Tomography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Materials Science(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of 2D rGO nanosheets on the properties of OPC paste'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this