Influence of solvent and molecular weight on thickness and surface topography of spin‐coated polymer films

Lora L. Spangler, John M. Torkelson*, J. Scot Royal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

109 Scopus citations

Abstract

The influence of polymer molecular weight, molecular weight distribution, and polymer‐solvent interactions on the thickness and topography of spin‐coated polymer films was examined. For films prepared from dilute solutions, highly volatile solvents or fair or “poor” solvents for the polymer adversely affect film surfaces causing nonuniformities (waves) to appear. However, if the concentration of these solutions is increased to approximately the concentration at which entanglements are formed, nearly uniform films are produced even if the solvent employed is highly volatile, such as dichloromethane. When toluene is employed as the solvent, which has a relatively low volatility and therefore forms nearly flat film surfaces, films prepared from dilute solution were found to have thicknesses, h, proportional to η o0.34 Ω−0.49 for polystyrene and η o−0.39 Ω−0.49 for poly(methylmethacrylate) where ηo is the zero‐shear rate solution viscosity and Ω is the rotational speed at which the films were prepared. These results suggest that the exponents associated with ηo and Ω may be nearly independent of the type of polymer used as long as flat films are produced. Finally, the molecular weight parameter most important in controlling final film thickness for films made from dilute solutions is Mv, the viscosity‐average molecular weight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)644-653
Number of pages10
JournalPolymer Engineering & Science
Volume30
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemistry
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Materials Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of solvent and molecular weight on thickness and surface topography of spin‐coated polymer films'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this