TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of thiol self-assembled monolayer processing on bottom-contact thin-film transistors based on n-type organic semiconductors
AU - Youn, Jangdae
AU - Dholakia, Geetha R.
AU - Huang, Hui
AU - Hennek, Jonnathan W.
AU - Facchetti, Antonio
AU - Marks, Tobin J.
PY - 2012/5/9
Y1 - 2012/5/9
N2 - The performance of bottom-contact thin-film transistor (TFT) structures lags behind that of top-contact structures owing to the far greater contact resistance. The major sources of the contact resistance in bottom-contact TFTs are believed to reflect a combination of non-optimal semiconductor growth morphology on the metallic contact surface and the limited available charge injection area versus top-contact geometries. As a part of an effort to understand the sources of high charge injection barriers in n-channel TFTs, the influence of thiol metal contact treatment on the molecular-level structures of such interfaces is investigated using hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)-treated SiO 2 gate dielectrics. The focus is on the self-assembled monolayer (SAM) contact surface treatment methods for bottom-contact TFTs based on two archetypical n-type semiconductors, α,ω- diperfluorohexylquarterthiophene (DFH-4T) and N,N'bis(n-octyl)-dicyanoperylene- 3,4:9,10-bis(dicarboximide) (PDI-8CN 2). TFT performance can be greatly enhanced, to the level of the top contact device performance in terms of mobility, on/off ratio, and contact resistance. To analyze the molecular-level film structural changes arising from the contact surface treatment, surface morphologies are characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). The high-resolution STM images show that the growth orientation of the semiconductor molecules at the gold/SAM/semiconductor interface preserves the molecular long axis orientation along the substrate normal. As a result, the film microstructure is well-organized for charge transport in the interfacial region.
AB - The performance of bottom-contact thin-film transistor (TFT) structures lags behind that of top-contact structures owing to the far greater contact resistance. The major sources of the contact resistance in bottom-contact TFTs are believed to reflect a combination of non-optimal semiconductor growth morphology on the metallic contact surface and the limited available charge injection area versus top-contact geometries. As a part of an effort to understand the sources of high charge injection barriers in n-channel TFTs, the influence of thiol metal contact treatment on the molecular-level structures of such interfaces is investigated using hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)-treated SiO 2 gate dielectrics. The focus is on the self-assembled monolayer (SAM) contact surface treatment methods for bottom-contact TFTs based on two archetypical n-type semiconductors, α,ω- diperfluorohexylquarterthiophene (DFH-4T) and N,N'bis(n-octyl)-dicyanoperylene- 3,4:9,10-bis(dicarboximide) (PDI-8CN 2). TFT performance can be greatly enhanced, to the level of the top contact device performance in terms of mobility, on/off ratio, and contact resistance. To analyze the molecular-level film structural changes arising from the contact surface treatment, surface morphologies are characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). The high-resolution STM images show that the growth orientation of the semiconductor molecules at the gold/SAM/semiconductor interface preserves the molecular long axis orientation along the substrate normal. As a result, the film microstructure is well-organized for charge transport in the interfacial region.
KW - bottom-contact organic thin-film transistors
KW - n-type organic semiconductors
KW - thiol self-assembled monolayers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860704101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860704101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/adfm.201102312
DO - 10.1002/adfm.201102312
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84860704101
SN - 1616-301X
VL - 22
SP - 1856
EP - 1869
JO - Advanced Functional Materials
JF - Advanced Functional Materials
IS - 9
ER -