Inside/beside dance studies: A conversation: Mellon dance studies in/and the humanities

Michelle Clayton, Mark Franko, Nadine George-Graves, André Lepecki, Susan Manning, Janice Ross, Rebecca Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2012, Susan Manning, Rebecca Schneider, and Janice Ross collaborated across their home institutions of Northwestern University, Brown University, and Stanford University, respectively, to found a research initiative interrogating the field of dance studies. This manifold project, Dance Studies in/and the Humanities, receives funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation through 2015 and includes a series of public roundtable discussions. This conversation-abridged from the original event-took place during two such roundtables at Brown University in June 2013, and it features substantial contributions from scholars Michelle Clayton, Mark Franko, Nadine George-Graves, André Lepecki, Susan Manning, Janice Ross, and Rebecca Schneider. Speakers address what dance studies may need, want, or do in this current historical moment. Manning articulates her experience being inside and beside dance studies through teaching in an integrationist/assimilationist model that promotes dance as a subfield in humanities (and occasionally social science) departments. Franko asserts that dance studies formed as a result of an epistemological break in the 1980s and adds that interdisciplinary frameworks can also support this relatively new field. Through embracing the partiality that comes with interdisciplinarity, Clayton encourages participants to investigate generative misunderstandings. Ross provides a comprehensive account of the crisis in the humanities, and Lepecki connects this crisis to the permanent state of war in the U.S. and emphasizes the importance of theory in dance studies. Falling short of Afro-pessimism, George-Graves calls for dance studies to infiltrate the upper echelons of higher education administration, and Schneider articulates post-structuralism's link to the Global South while calling for more scholarly representation from this area of the world. Through exploring possibilities for embodied knowledge, reenacting post-structuralism, and embracing partiality, these scholars address the expanding aperture of dance studies in a global economy. Topics identified for future discussion include decentering the whiteness of dance studies transnationally, exploring how dance studies methodologies are currently utilized in academia, and expanding dance studies beyond the American academy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-28
Number of pages24
JournalDance Research Journal
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Keywords

  • Academia
  • Afro-pessimism
  • Agency
  • Assimilationist
  • Choreography as research
  • Choreopolitical
  • Crisis in humanities
  • Dance and higher education
  • Dance and humanities
  • Dance and theater
  • Dance and theory
  • Dance and visual art
  • Dance dramaturgy
  • Dance methodology
  • Dance Studies
  • Embodied knowledge
  • Generative misunderstandings
  • Global South
  • Graduate dance programs
  • Higher education administration
  • Humanism
  • Integrationist
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Partiality
  • Pedagogy
  • Performance studies
  • Political theory
  • Post-structuralism
  • Privilege
  • Reenactment
  • Slash
  • Society of Dance History Scholars
  • Transnationalism
  • Undergraduate dance programs
  • War
  • Western theater dance
  • Whiteness
  • World dance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Inside/beside dance studies: A conversation: Mellon dance studies in/and the humanities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this