TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights into Nitrous Oxide Mitigation Strategies in Wastewater Treatment and Challenges for Wider Implementation
AU - Duan, Haoran
AU - Zhao, Yingfen
AU - Koch, Konrad
AU - Wells, George F.
AU - Zheng, Min
AU - Yuan, Zhiguo
AU - Ye, Liu
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Australian Research Council (ARC) through project DP180103369. We appreciate the research partnership programs between The University of Queensland and Technical University of Munich. Y.Z. acknowledges the scholarship support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) and the University of Queensland. G.F.W. was supported by the US National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2033793. Z.Y. is a recipient of the Australian Research Council Australian Laureate Fellowship (FL170100086).
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions account for the majority of the carbon footprint of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Many N2O mitigation strategies have since been developed while a holistic view is still missing. This article reviews the state-of-the-art of N2O mitigation studies in wastewater treatment. Through analyzing existing studies, this article presents the essential knowledge to guide N2O mitigations, and the logics behind mitigation strategies. In practice, mitigations are mainly carried out by aeration control, feed scheme optimization, and process optimization. Despite increasingly more studies, real implementation remains rare, which is a combined result of unclear climate change policies/incentives, as well as technical challenges. Five critical technical challenges, as well as opportunities, of N2O mitigations were identified. It is proposed that (i) quantification methods for overall N2O emissions and pathway contributions need improvement; (ii) a reliable while straightforward mathematical model is required to quantify benefits and compare mitigation strategies; (iii) tailored risk assessment needs to be conducted for WWTPs, in which more long-term full-scale trials of N2O mitigation are urgently needed to enable robust assessments of the resulting operational costs and impact on nutrient removal performance; (iv) current mitigation strategies focus on centralized WWTPs, more investigations are warranted for decentralised systems, especially decentralized activated sludge WWTPs; and (v) N2O may be mitigated by adopting novel strategies promoting N2O reduction denitrification or microorganisms that emit less N2O. Overall, we conclude N2O mitigation research is reaching a maturity while challenges still exist for a wider implementation, especially in relation to the reliability of N2O mitigation strategies and potential risks to nutrient removal performances of WWTPs.
AB - Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions account for the majority of the carbon footprint of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Many N2O mitigation strategies have since been developed while a holistic view is still missing. This article reviews the state-of-the-art of N2O mitigation studies in wastewater treatment. Through analyzing existing studies, this article presents the essential knowledge to guide N2O mitigations, and the logics behind mitigation strategies. In practice, mitigations are mainly carried out by aeration control, feed scheme optimization, and process optimization. Despite increasingly more studies, real implementation remains rare, which is a combined result of unclear climate change policies/incentives, as well as technical challenges. Five critical technical challenges, as well as opportunities, of N2O mitigations were identified. It is proposed that (i) quantification methods for overall N2O emissions and pathway contributions need improvement; (ii) a reliable while straightforward mathematical model is required to quantify benefits and compare mitigation strategies; (iii) tailored risk assessment needs to be conducted for WWTPs, in which more long-term full-scale trials of N2O mitigation are urgently needed to enable robust assessments of the resulting operational costs and impact on nutrient removal performance; (iv) current mitigation strategies focus on centralized WWTPs, more investigations are warranted for decentralised systems, especially decentralized activated sludge WWTPs; and (v) N2O may be mitigated by adopting novel strategies promoting N2O reduction denitrification or microorganisms that emit less N2O. Overall, we conclude N2O mitigation research is reaching a maturity while challenges still exist for a wider implementation, especially in relation to the reliability of N2O mitigation strategies and potential risks to nutrient removal performances of WWTPs.
KW - challenges
KW - greenhouse gas
KW - mitigation
KW - nitrogen removal
KW - nitrous oxide
KW - perspectives
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106518648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106518648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.1c00840
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.1c00840
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33975433
AN - SCOPUS:85106518648
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 55
SP - 7208
EP - 7224
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 11
ER -